espn
gq

Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of ESPN vs GQ. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.

VS

Profile Overview

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@espn

100

Excellent

Account Health

@gq

100

Excellent

Leader
Instagram profile picture of @espn

ESPN

@espn

🏆@sportscenter 🏉@espnnfl 🏀@nbaonespn 👊@espnmma 💥@espnringside ⚽️ @espnfc 💪@espnw 🍿@collegegameday 🏈@espncfb 📈@sportscenternext 🏎️ @espnf1 💰@espnbet

28.3M

Followers

80%

576

Following

73.1K

Posts

80%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison🔝 Leading
Instagram profile picture of @gq

GQ

@gq

Big fits start here. @gqsports @gqrecommends @gqbox

7.2M

Followers

20%

989

Following

18.3K

Posts

20%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison📉 Trailing

Key Metrics Head-to-Head

@espn
5
Winning on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 1 Ahead
@gq
1
Trailing on metrics
@espn
Detailed Breakdown
@gq
28.3M
Followers
75% ahead
7.2M
576
Following
42% ahead
989
73.1K
Total Posts
75% ahead
18.3K
0.37%
Engagement Rate
11% ahead
0.33%
103K
Avg Likes
77% ahead
23.6K
1.2K
Avg Comments
93% ahead
84
🏆 espn5 - 1gq

Advanced Metrics

Authority Score
Winner
73
Expert
@espn
Reach25/25
Engagement3/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
70
Expert
@gq
Reach22/25
Engagement3/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10

Account Tier

Celebrity

28.3M followers

Range: 10M+

@espn

Mega

7.2M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@gq

Influence Index
Winner
72
/ 100
@espn
Influence Index
67
/ 100
@gq

Engagement Quality

@espn

0.37%

Benchmark: 0.1-0.2%

Low

@gq

0.33%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@espn

1:49.1K

Very influential

Excellent

@gq

1:7.3K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@espn1.2%
@gq0.4%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@espn3.6
@gq3.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@espn

2.58

Active

@gq

2.54

Active

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

espn42
gq42

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

espn42
gq42

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

espn4
gq3
Difference: 0 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

espn66
gq65
Difference: 1 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Top Posts

Winner
Top post by @espn

NEW YORK VS. SAN ANTONIO 🏆 THE 2026 NBA FINALS ARE SET 🔥

@espn
345.4K
2.5K
Top post by @gq

There is nothing else that currently exists in filmmaking like a Christopher Nolan production. “If you’re lucky enough to succeed with a project,” the director explains, “you kind of have a responsibility as a filmmaker to try and say, ‘Okay, what can I do? What am I allowed to do now that maybe I wouldn’t have been allowed to do before or somebody else wouldn’t be allowed to do?’” “Obviously, coming off the back of the success of Oppenheimer, it was like, All right, we’ve got to use this opportunity to try and really do the most ambitious thing that we can.” Nolan soon decided the most ambitious thing he could do was: adapt Homer’s Odyssey. At the link in bio, read GQ’s Summer cover story on how Hollywood’s three leading-est men Matt Damon, Robert Pattinson, and Tom Holland led a cast and crew of hundreds to help Nolan create his most epic and ambitious blockbuster to date. Story by @zachbaron Photographs by @alexprager Styled by @georgecortina Hair by @teddycharleshair at Nevermind Skin by @jostrettell at Walter Schupfer Management Set design by @joneslikeindiana Tailoring by Yelena Travkina and Susanna Badalyan Key Gaffer by @mick411 Key Grip by @Clayton_n_iii Retouching by @bermudezstudio Produced by @campproductions

@gq
62.7K
142
🏆 345.4K likesVS62.7K likes

espn has 282.7K more likes on their top post

Hashtag Strategy

Stronger Hashtag Use
@espn

3

With Hashtags

9

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.3
Avg Likes39K
Avg Comments471
Hashtags show no clear boost
#nbafinals#1#nba
@gq

1

With Hashtags

11

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.2
Avg Likes15.3K
Avg Comments45
Hashtags show no clear boost
#twilight#batman

@espn has stronger hashtag impact

Engagement Trends

@espn
Falling

-72.0%

Engagement shift

-72%

Likes

-76%

Comments

Older posts avg162.9K
Recent posts avg45.6K
Stronger Trend
@gq
Falling

-57.0%

Engagement shift

-57%

Likes

-65%

Comments

Older posts avg33.1K
Recent posts avg14.2K

@gq shows better recent momentum

Posting Rhythm

@espn

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Wednesday
Consistency5%

@gq

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency16%

Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.

Expert Verdict

Overall Verdict:

@espn leads in most key metrics.

The comparison shows @espn outperforming @gq most notably in Followers.

Followers

@espn dominates in reach and follower volume.

Engagement Rate

@espn delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.

Quick Summary

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Popular Comparisons

See how these accounts stack up

Results FAQ

FAQ: @espn vs @gq

Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparisons: @espn vs @gq

espn vs gqespn vs gq Instagramespn and gq comparedCompare espn and gqespn versus gq on Instagramespn vs gq follower countespn vs gq engagement statsespn gq Instagram comparisonWho has more followers: espn or gq?espn vs gq profile statsespn or gq – who performs better?espn vs gq side by sideESPN vs GQESPN GQ Instagram comparisonCompare ESPN and GQ