gq
rollingstone

Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of GQ vs Rolling Stone. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.

VS

Profile Overview

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@gq

100

Excellent

Account Health

@rollingstone

100

Excellent

Instagram profile picture of @gq

GQ

@gq

Big fits start here. @gqsports @gqrecommends @gqbox

7.2M

Followers

46%

989

Following

18.3K

Posts

54%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison📉 Trailing
Leader
Instagram profile picture of @rollingstone

Rolling Stone

@rollingstone

8.6M

Followers

54%

631

Following

15.7K

Posts

46%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison🔝 Leading

Key Metrics Head-to-Head

@gq
2
Trailing on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 2 Ahead
@rollingstone
4
Winning on metrics
@gq
Detailed Breakdown
@rollingstone
7.2M
Followers
16% ahead
8.6M
989
Following
36% ahead
631
18.3K
Total Posts
14% ahead
15.7K
0.33%
Engagement Rate
64% ahead
0.92%
23.6K
Avg Likes
70% ahead
78.5K
84
Avg Comments
87% ahead
668
gq2 - 4🏆 rollingstone

Advanced Metrics

Authority Score
70
Expert
@gq
Reach22/25
Engagement3/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
Winner
72
Expert
@rollingstone
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10

Account Tier

Mega

7.2M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@gq

Mega

8.6M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@rollingstone

Influence Index
67
/ 100
@gq
Influence Index
Winner
70
/ 100
@rollingstone

Engagement Quality

@gq

0.33%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

@rollingstone

0.92%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@gq

1:7.3K

Very influential

Excellent

@rollingstone

1:13.6K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@gq0.4%
@rollingstone0.9%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@gq3.3
@rollingstone9.1

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@gq

2.54

Active

@rollingstone

1.83

Active

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

gq42
rollingstone46
Difference: 4 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

gq42
rollingstone46
Difference: 4 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

gq3
rollingstone9
Difference: 6 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

gq65
rollingstone68
Difference: 3 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Top Posts

Top post by @gq

There is nothing else that currently exists in filmmaking like a Christopher Nolan production. “If you’re lucky enough to succeed with a project,” the director explains, “you kind of have a responsibility as a filmmaker to try and say, ‘Okay, what can I do? What am I allowed to do now that maybe I wouldn’t have been allowed to do before or somebody else wouldn’t be allowed to do?’” “Obviously, coming off the back of the success of Oppenheimer, it was like, All right, we’ve got to use this opportunity to try and really do the most ambitious thing that we can.” Nolan soon decided the most ambitious thing he could do was: adapt Homer’s Odyssey. At the link in bio, read GQ’s Summer cover story on how Hollywood’s three leading-est men Matt Damon, Robert Pattinson, and Tom Holland led a cast and crew of hundreds to help Nolan create his most epic and ambitious blockbuster to date. Story by @zachbaron Photographs by @alexprager Styled by @georgecortina Hair by @teddycharleshair at Nevermind Skin by @jostrettell at Walter Schupfer Management Set design by @joneslikeindiana Tailoring by Yelena Travkina and Susanna Badalyan Key Gaffer by @mick411 Key Grip by @Clayton_n_iii Retouching by @bermudezstudio Produced by @campproductions

@gq
62.7K
142
Winner
Top post by @rollingstone

Presenting Rolling Stone’s biggest cover ever: @bts.bighitofficial for May 2026 💜 How did the world’s biggest band reclaim their crown? By overcoming doubt & returning to their roots on an adventurous album. Our issue features eight different covers: one featuring #BTS, and one for each member. For today’s cover story, #방탄소년단 sat down with @hiattb for a deep dive about their new album and reuniting. Come back tomorrow (and each day after) for a solo cover real + new video interview + new cover story. ON SALE NOW: The ‘BTS: The Cover Collection’ brings all 8 covers together in one set, the best way to secure the full collection. Tap to shop, while supplies last. Writer @hiattb Photographer @pakbae Editors in Chief @seanfwoods & @shirleyhalperin Executive Music Editor Christian Hoard Creative Director @joe_hutchinson Director of Photography @jennsantana Director of Social & Video @waiss_aramesh Associate Director of Social Media @leahluser Executive Producer @chriskimfilm Producer/colorist @mitchsaavedra Senior Product Designer @nthompson89 Senior Visuals Editor @photoeditorjoe Styling @yeyewrks Hair @bit.boot_hansom @bit.boot_kimhwayeon @ozikc Makeup @da_a_reum @shinae.lee Set Designer @yeabyul Production by @_nuhana Nuhana Executive Producer @sooh_hwang Nuhana Producers Producer @sebbbing @Kalegno Nuhana Line Producer @_justcallmecherry RS video DoP @mikebeechfilm Gaffer/Camera Operator Wonman Kim Camera Operators: Byeong Hwi Min, Churl Gwon, Hyunsuh Paik DIT: Jiwoon Lee Sound operator: Min Jae Lee Digital Technician Huijin Kim Post-Production @glossnewyork Photo Assistance: Soojung Oh, Minhyuk Lee, Minjun Kim, Jihyun Oh, Juwan Kang, Junhyung Yang Set Design assistance: Sohyun Won, Yunseon Choi, Junhyuk Sim Production assistant Seohyun Yoon

@rollingstone
765.7K
6.9K
62.7K likesVS765.7K likes 🏆

rollingstone has 703K more likes on their top post

Hashtag Strategy

@gq

1

With Hashtags

11

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.2
Avg Likes15.3K
Avg Comments45
Hashtags show no clear boost
#twilight#batman
Stronger Hashtag Use
@rollingstone

1

With Hashtags

11

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.1
Avg Likes765.7K
Avg Comments6.9K
Hashtags increase engagement
#bts

@rollingstone has stronger hashtag impact

Engagement Trends

Stronger Trend
@gq
Falling

-57.0%

Engagement shift

-57%

Likes

-65%

Comments

Older posts avg33.1K
Recent posts avg14.2K
@rollingstone
Falling

-94.5%

Engagement shift

-94%

Likes

-97%

Comments

Older posts avg150.2K
Recent posts avg8.3K

@gq shows better recent momentum

Posting Rhythm

@gq

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency16%

@rollingstone

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Wednesday
Consistency12%

Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.

Expert Verdict

Overall Verdict:

@rollingstone leads in most key metrics.

The comparison shows @rollingstone outperforming @gq most notably in Engagement Rate.

Followers

@rollingstone dominates in reach and follower volume.

Engagement Rate

@rollingstone delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.

Quick Summary

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Popular Comparisons

See how these accounts stack up

Results FAQ

FAQ: @gq vs @rollingstone

Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparisons: @gq vs @rollingstone

gq vs rollingstonegq vs rollingstone Instagramgq and rollingstone comparedCompare gq and rollingstonegq versus rollingstone on Instagramgq vs rollingstone follower countgq vs rollingstone engagement statsgq rollingstone Instagram comparisonWho has more followers: gq or rollingstone?gq vs rollingstone profile statsgq or rollingstone – who performs better?gq vs rollingstone side by sideGQ vs Rolling StoneGQ Rolling Stone Instagram comparisonCompare GQ and Rolling Stone