iflscience
sciencechannel

Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of IFLScience vs Science Channel. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.

VS

Profile Overview

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@iflscience

95

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencechannel

100

Excellent

Instagram profile picture of @iflscience

IFLScience

@iflscience

The lighter side of science 🚀 For more science news click here 👇👇👇👇

696.1K

Followers

21%

309

Following

10.7K

Posts

78%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison📉 Trailing
Leader
Instagram profile picture of @sciencechannel

Science Channel

@sciencechannel

For the love of science.

2.7M

Followers

79%

217

Following

2.9K

Posts

22%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison🔝 Leading

Key Metrics Head-to-Head

@iflscience
4
Winning on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 1 Ahead
@sciencechannel
2
Trailing on metrics
@iflscience
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencechannel
696.1K
Followers
74% ahead
2.7M
309
Following
30% ahead
217
10.7K
Total Posts
73% ahead
2.9K
0.05%
Engagement Rate
58% ahead
0.02%
375
Avg Likes
38% ahead
602
3
Avg Comments
33% ahead
2
🏆 iflscience4 - 2sciencechannel

Advanced Metrics

Authority Score
65
Expert
@iflscience
Reach20/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
Winner
67
Expert
@sciencechannel
Reach22/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10

Account Tier

Large

696.1K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@iflscience

Mega

2.7M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@sciencechannel

Influence Index
60
/ 100
@iflscience
Influence Index
Winner
65
/ 100
@sciencechannel

Engagement Quality

@iflscience

0.05%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

@sciencechannel

0.02%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@iflscience

1:2.3K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencechannel

1:12.2K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@iflscience0.8%
@sciencechannel0.3%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@iflscience0.5
@sciencechannel0.2

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@iflscience

15.34

Very Active

@sciencechannel

1.11

Active

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

iflscience40
sciencechannel40

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

iflscience40
sciencechannel40

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

iflscience1
sciencechannel0
Difference: 0 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

iflscience35
sciencechannel38
Difference: 3 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Top Posts

Top post by @iflscience

Only 1% of people will get this joke 🫠🫠

@iflscience
1.2K
6
Winner
Top post by @sciencechannel

This mineral is only found in ONE place in the world! 🌍 #UndergroundMarvels #minerals

@sciencechannel
1.6K
9
1.2K likesVS1.6K likes 🏆

sciencechannel has 459 more likes on their top post

Hashtag Strategy

@iflscience

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags show no clear boost
Stronger Hashtag Use
@sciencechannel

12

With Hashtags

0

Without Hashtags

Avg per post2.1
Avg Likes602
Avg Comments2
Hashtags increase engagement
#undergroundmarvels#howitsmade#baseball#grandcanyon#glove

@sciencechannel has stronger hashtag impact

Engagement Trends

@iflscience
Falling

-29.2%

Engagement shift

-29%

Likes

-5%

Comments

Older posts avg443
Recent posts avg313
Stronger Trend
@sciencechannel
Falling

-24.4%

Engagement shift

-24%

Likes

-55%

Comments

Older posts avg688
Recent posts avg520

@sciencechannel shows better recent momentum

Posting Rhythm

@iflscience

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Sunday
Consistency59%

@sciencechannel

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Monday
Consistency100%

Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.

Expert Verdict

Overall Verdict:

@iflscience delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.

The comparison shows @sciencechannel outperforming @iflscience most notably in Followers.

Followers

@sciencechannel dominates in reach and follower volume.

Engagement Rate

@iflscience delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.

Quick Summary

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Popular Comparisons

See how these accounts stack up

Results FAQ

FAQ: @iflscience vs @sciencechannel

Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparisons: @iflscience vs @sciencechannel

iflscience vs sciencechanneliflscience vs sciencechannel Instagramiflscience and sciencechannel comparedCompare iflscience and sciencechanneliflscience versus sciencechannel on Instagramiflscience vs sciencechannel follower countiflscience vs sciencechannel engagement statsiflscience sciencechannel Instagram comparisonWho has more followers: iflscience or sciencechannel?iflscience vs sciencechannel profile statsiflscience or sciencechannel – who performs better?iflscience vs sciencechannel side by sideIFLScience vs Science ChannelIFLScience Science Channel Instagram comparisonCompare IFLScience and Science Channel