Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of IFLScience vs Science Magazine. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.
Profile Overview
Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators
Account Health
@iflscience
95
Excellent
Account Health
@sciencemagazine
95
Excellent
696.1K
Followers
57%
309
Following
10.7K
Posts
86%
Healthy ratio
Science Magazine
@sciencemagazine
The award-winning Instagram feed for the Science family of journals, sharing cutting-edge research, news, commentary, and visuals.
521.1K
Followers
43%
124
Following
1.7K
Posts
14%
Healthy ratio
Key Metrics Head-to-Head
Advanced Metrics
Account Tier
696.1K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@iflscience
521.1K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@sciencemagazine
Engagement Quality
@iflscience
0.05%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@sciencemagazine
0.36%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Following/Followers Ratio
@iflscience
1:2.3K
Very influential
@sciencemagazine
1:4.2K
Very influential
Comment-to-Like Ratio
Higher = more thoughtful engagement
Virality Potential
Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@iflscience
15.34
Very Active@sciencemagazine
3.25
ActiveJolygram Intelligence Metrics
Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns
Growth Velocity Index
Recent growth momentum
Audience Quality Score
Quality of follower base
Content Performance Index
Engagement per follower
Overall Influence Index
Combined influence potential
Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.
Top Posts
As an asteroid hurtles toward Earth in the 1998 movie Armageddon, a geologist teams up with a veteran oil rig team on a desperate mission: Land on the space rock, drill into its surface, and detonate a nuclear bomb deep inside. They succeed, but the geologist, played by Steve Buscemi, is one of few who make it home alive. According to a new study of movie geologists, he was lucky. Out of 202 movie geologists found in 141 movies released between 1919 and 2023, 69 die on screen or are found dead—a mortality rate of about one-third, according to a paper published last month in Geology Today. The authors, several geologists–slash–movie buffs, began their analysis more than a decade ago and have provided regular updates, although this is the first in a scientific journal. To learn more, click the link in our bio. PHOTO CREDIT: UNIVERSAL PICTURES/ALAMY
sciencemagazine has 4.9K more likes on their top post
Hashtag Strategy
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
2
With Hashtags
10
Without Hashtags
@sciencemagazine has stronger hashtag impact
Engagement Trends
-29.2%
Engagement shift
Likes
Comments
-39.1%
Engagement shift
Likes
Comments
@iflscience shows better recent momentum
Posting Rhythm
@iflscience
@sciencemagazine
Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.
Expert Verdict
Overall Verdict:
@sciencemagazine delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.
Followers
@iflscience dominates in reach and follower volume.
Engagement Rate
@sciencemagazine delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.
Quick Summary
Data updated based on recent public posts.
Popular Comparisons
See how these accounts stack up
FAQ: @iflscience vs @sciencemagazine
Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison
Still have questions?
Contact us