Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of International Space Station vs NASA Webb Telescope. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.
Profile Overview
Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators
Account Health
@iss
100
Excellent
Account Health
@nasawebb
100
Excellent

International Space Station
@iss
The International Space Station is a collaboration of 15 nations working together to operate a world-class, state-of-the-art orbiting laboratory.
9M
Followers
72%
84
Following
3.9K
Posts
75%
Healthy ratio

NASA Webb Telescope
@nasawebb
The Official *NASA* James Webb Space Telescope account Launch: Dec. 25, 2021. First images: July 12, 2022.
3.5M
Followers
28%
34
Following
1.3K
Posts
25%
Healthy ratio
Key Metrics Head-to-Head
Advanced Metrics
Account Tier
9M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@iss
3.5M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@nasawebb
Engagement Quality
@iss
0.15%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@nasawebb
2.15%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@iss
1:107.1K
Very influential
@nasawebb
1:104.2K
Very influential
Comment-to-Like Ratio
Higher = more thoughtful engagement
Virality Potential
Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@iss
0.44
Moderate@nasawebb
0.36
ModerateJolygram Intelligence Metrics
Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns
Growth Velocity Index
Recent growth momentum
Audience Quality Score
Quality of follower base
Content Performance Index
Engagement per follower
Overall Influence Index
Combined influence potential
Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.
Top Posts

This photo illustrates three phenomena that surprised me when I arrived on board the @iss. I didn’t realize before seeing it with my own eyes that the Earth’s atmosphere would be so visible in the night sky, seemingly even more obvious at nighttime than daytime, nor that it would be so colorful! These orange and green colors on the horizon are airglow, a faint emission of light caused by chemical reactions and interactions between UV radiation and gases in our atmosphere (unlike aurora, which is caused by solar wind particles interacting with Earth’s magnetic field, airglow is present everywhere, all of the time). I was also surprised to see how blue and well lit the Earth can be at night, when a bright Moon illuminates it (Moonglow!). This photo was taken on May 30, the day prior to the full Moon. I hope that this provides a bit more @nasaartemis Moon Joy for all of us!

Don’t let anyone dull your shine 💫 The heart of galaxy M77 is shining so brightly in this Webb telescope image, it nearly outshines the galaxy itself. The intense glow is due to gas being pulled into a tight and rapid orbit around the central black hole. The motion of the gas heats it up, releasing tremendous amounts of radiation. The first image is Webb’s mid-infrared view with swirling filaments of dust shown in blue. The glowing orange bubbles along the arms are being carved out by newly-formed star clusters. In the second image, the near-infrared reveals a bar spanning 6,000 light-years across the central region. This bar is enclosed by a bright ring, called a starburst ring, formed by the inner ends of the galaxy’s two spiral arms. Starburst regions in galaxies are zones of high star formation rates. The third image is a composite image, combining both mid and near-infrared shots into one. Those bright orange lines radiating out of the center of all images are diffraction spikes, an optical effect caused by the telescope itself. When observing a bright object such as a star, the light gets slightly bent (or diffracted) around some of the telescope’s structures. Due to Webb’s optics, its images have a six-plus-two-pointed pattern around bright objects. Hubble images have four-pointed patterns due to its structure. Credit: ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, A. Leroy #NASA #Webb #Galaxy
nasawebb has 704.5K more likes on their top post
Hashtag Strategy
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
4
With Hashtags
8
Without Hashtags
@nasawebb has stronger hashtag impact
Engagement Trends
-10.4%
Engagement shift
Likes
Comments
-86.0%
Engagement shift
Likes
Comments
@iss shows better recent momentum
Posting Rhythm
@iss
@nasawebb
Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.
Expert Verdict
Overall Verdict:
@nasawebb delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.
Followers
@iss dominates in reach and follower volume.
Engagement Rate
@nasawebb delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.
Quick Summary
Data updated based on recent public posts.
Popular Comparisons
See how these accounts stack up
























FAQ: @iss vs @nasawebb
Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison
Still have questions?
Contact us