quarks.de
sciencemagazine

Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of Quarks vs Science Magazine. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.

VS

Profile Overview

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@quarks.de

100

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencemagazine

95

Excellent

Leader
Instagram profile picture of @quarks.de

Quarks

@quarks.de

Wissenschaft statt Bauchgefühl | ARD Gemacht mit Hirn, Herz und unserem Rundfunkbeitrag.

1.7M

Followers

77%

16

Following

4.6K

Posts

73%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison🔝 Leading
Instagram profile picture of @sciencemagazine

Science Magazine

@sciencemagazine

The award-winning Instagram feed for the Science family of journals, sharing cutting-edge research, news, commentary, and visuals.

521.1K

Followers

23%

124

Following

1.7K

Posts

27%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison📉 Trailing

Key Metrics Head-to-Head

@quarks.de
5
Winning on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 1 Ahead
@sciencemagazine
1
Trailing on metrics
@quarks.de
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencemagazine
1.7M
Followers
70% ahead
521.1K
16
Following
87% ahead
124
4.6K
Total Posts
63% ahead
1.7K
1.16%
Engagement Rate
69% ahead
0.36%
19.3K
Avg Likes
90% ahead
1.9K
613
Avg Comments
97% ahead
18
🏆 quarks.de5 - 1sciencemagazine

Advanced Metrics

Authority Score
Winner
77
Expert
@quarks.de
Reach22/25
Engagement10/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
58
Established
@sciencemagazine
Reach20/25
Engagement3/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

Account Tier

Mega

1.7M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@quarks.de

Large

521.1K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@sciencemagazine

Influence Index
Winner
71
/ 100
@quarks.de
Influence Index
47
/ 100
@sciencemagazine

Engagement Quality

@quarks.de

1.16%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Average

@sciencemagazine

0.36%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@quarks.de

1:107K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencemagazine

1:4.2K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@quarks.de3.2%
@sciencemagazine1.0%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@quarks.de11.2
@sciencemagazine3.6

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@quarks.de

2.70

Active

@sciencemagazine

3.25

Active

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

quarks.de47
sciencemagazine42
Difference: 5 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

quarks.de47
sciencemagazine42
Difference: 5 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

quarks.de12
sciencemagazine4
Difference: 8 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

quarks.de65
sciencemagazine39
Difference: 26 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Top Posts

Winner
Top post by @quarks.de

Was sind deine größten Zukunftssorgen im Bezug auf den Klimawandel? Und wie optimistisch bist du, dass wir die Erderwärmung rechtzeitig begrenzen können? Die klimapolitischen Entscheidungen in den nächsten Jahren entscheiden darüber, welche Zukunft wir erleben werden. Wenn weiter in dem Rahmen Klimaschutz betrieben wird wie bisher, wird sich die Erde bis Ende des Jahrhunderts deutlich stärker erwärmen als um 1,5 Grad. Auch unter 2 Grad würden wir dann nicht bleiben. Das hätte deutliche Konsequenzen für unsere Zukunft. Je weiter die Erwärmung voranschreitet, desto heftiger fallen diese aus. So wird es dann immer mehr Hitzewellen geben, aber auch Versorgungskrisen und einige Gebiete auf der Erde werden dann nicht mehr bewohnbar sein. Unsere wichtigsten Quellen: IPCC (2023): Synthesis Report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report AR6, Summary for Policymakers (SPM) IPCC (2021): The Physical Science Basis, Sixth Assessment Report AR6, Summary for Policymakers (SPM)

@quarks.de
52.8K
2.1K
Top post by @sciencemagazine

As an asteroid hurtles toward Earth in the 1998 movie Armageddon, a geologist teams up with a veteran oil rig team on a desperate mission: Land on the space rock, drill into its surface, and detonate a nuclear bomb deep inside. They succeed, but the geologist, played by Steve Buscemi, is one of few who make it home alive.⁠ ⁠ According to a new study of movie geologists, he was lucky.⁠ ⁠ Out of 202 movie geologists found in 141 movies released between 1919 and 2023, 69 die on screen or are found dead—a mortality rate of about one-third, according to a paper published last month in Geology Today.⁠ ⁠ The authors, several geologists–slash–movie buffs, began their analysis more than a decade ago and have provided regular updates, although this is the first in a scientific journal.⁠ ⁠ To learn more, click the link in our bio.⁠ ⁠ PHOTO CREDIT: UNIVERSAL PICTURES/ALAMY

@sciencemagazine
6.1K
60
🏆 52.8K likesVS6.1K likes

quarks.de has 46.7K more likes on their top post

Hashtag Strategy

@quarks.de

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags show no clear boost
Stronger Hashtag Use
@sciencemagazine

2

With Hashtags

10

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.2
Avg Likes1.8K
Avg Comments33
Hashtags show no clear boost
#worldmilkday#mentalhealthawarenessmonth

@sciencemagazine has stronger hashtag impact

Engagement Trends

Stronger Trend
@quarks.de
Rising

+28.4%

Engagement shift

+29%

Likes

+3%

Comments

Older posts avg17.4K
Recent posts avg22.3K
@sciencemagazine
Falling

-39.1%

Engagement shift

-39%

Likes

+0%

Comments

Older posts avg2.4K
Recent posts avg1.4K

@quarks.de shows better recent momentum

Posting Rhythm

@quarks.de

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Sunday
Consistency71%

@sciencemagazine

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Tuesday
Consistency41%

Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.

Expert Verdict

Overall Verdict:

@quarks.de leads in most key metrics.

The comparison shows @quarks.de outperforming @sciencemagazine most notably in Followers.

Followers

@quarks.de dominates in reach and follower volume.

Engagement Rate

@quarks.de delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.

Quick Summary

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Popular Comparisons

See how these accounts stack up

Results FAQ

FAQ: @quarks.de vs @sciencemagazine

Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparisons: @quarks.de vs @sciencemagazine

quarks.de vs sciencemagazinequarks.de vs sciencemagazine Instagramquarks.de and sciencemagazine comparedCompare quarks.de and sciencemagazinequarks.de versus sciencemagazine on Instagramquarks.de vs sciencemagazine follower countquarks.de vs sciencemagazine engagement statsquarks.de sciencemagazine Instagram comparisonWho has more followers: quarks.de or sciencemagazine?quarks.de vs sciencemagazine profile statsquarks.de or sciencemagazine – who performs better?quarks.de vs sciencemagazine side by sideQuarks vs Science MagazineQuarks Science Magazine Instagram comparisonCompare Quarks and Science Magazine