brilliantorg
sciencefunn

Comparación de perfiles de Instagram de Brilliant.org y Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko. Seguidores, interacción, actividad y rendimiento comparados.

VS

Resumen de Perfiles

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@brilliantorg

85

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencefunn

100

Excellent

Instagram profile picture of @brilliantorg

Brilliant.org

@brilliantorg

Learn by doing. Math, Computer Science, and Science.

436.1K

Seguidores

14%

59

Siguiendo

323

Publicaciones

24%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityMedium
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación📉 Trailing
Leader
Instagram profile picture of @sciencefunn

Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko

@sciencefunn

Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:

2.8M

Seguidores

86%

327

Siguiendo

1K

Publicaciones

76%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación🔝 Leading

Métricas Clave Cara a Cara

@brilliantorg
0
Trailing on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 2 Ahead
@sciencefunn
6
Winning on metrics
@brilliantorg
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencefunn
436.1K
Seguidores
84% ahead
2.8M
59
Siguiendo
82% ahead
327
323
Total Publicaciones
69% ahead
1K
0.06%
Tasa de Engagement
93% ahead
0.83%
249
Prom. Likes
99% ahead
22.9K
14
Prom. Comentarios
92% ahead
174
brilliantorg0 - 6🏆 sciencefunn

Métricas Avanzadas

Puntuación de Autoridad
48
Established
@brilliantorg
Reach17/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency11/15
Verification0/10
Puntuación de Autoridad
Winner
62
Expert
@sciencefunn
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

Nivel de Cuenta

Medium

436.1K followers

Range: 50K-500K

@brilliantorg

Mega

2.8M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@sciencefunn

Índice de Influencia
40
/ 100
@brilliantorg
Índice de Influencia
Ganador
54
/ 100
@sciencefunn

Calidad de Engagement

@brilliantorg

0.06%

Benchmark: 1-3%

Low

@sciencefunn

0.83%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Ratio Siguiendo/Seguidores

@brilliantorg

1:7.4K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencefunn

1:8.5K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@brilliantorg5.6%
@sciencefunn0.8%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@brilliantorg0.6
@sciencefunn8.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Densidad de Contenido(posts per 1K followers)

@brilliantorg

0.74

Moderate

@sciencefunn

0.38

Moderate

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

brilliantorg40
sciencefunn45
Difference: 5 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

brilliantorg40
sciencefunn45
Difference: 5 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

brilliantorg1
sciencefunn8
Difference: 8 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

brilliantorg33
sciencefunn65
Difference: 32 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Publicaciones Top

Top post by @brilliantorg

Exponential functions describe quantities that change by constant percentages rather than constant amounts. They take the form f(x) = a·b^x, where a is the initial value and b is the base. When b > 1, the function represents exponential growth, and when 0 < b < 1, it represents exponential decay. This means the function’s value multiplies by the same factor for each increase in x, producing a smooth curve that rises or falls quickly and approaches, but never touches, the x-axis. These functions appear in many real-world situations, such as population growth, compound interest, and radioactive decay, where change accelerates or slows over time. Their distinctive shape and consistent rate of change make exponential functions essential for modeling rapid processes and predicting how quantities evolve in both natural and human-made systems. I’ve always believed that understanding why each step works is far more meaningful than simply memorizing procedures. That’s why I enjoy using Brilliant - their interactive lessons don’t just hand you the answer; they help you uncover the reasoning behind it. When you get to manipulate the equations yourself and actually see how each transformation impacts the result, the concept becomes intuitive and memorable. It’s that hands-on exploration that transforms math from something you follow into something you truly understand. Like this video and follow @mathswithmuza for more! #math #maths #education #stem #learn #learning #function #foryou #coding #ai #chatgpt #physics #mathematics #reels #school #highschool #college #university

@brilliantorg
739
9
Ganador
Top post by @sciencefunn

LEGO isn’t just a toy; it’s a masterclass in high-precision engineering and materials science. Here are some of the coolest science-based facts about those iconic plastic bricks. 1. The Physics of “Clutch Power” The reason LEGO bricks snap together and stay together is due to a mechanical property called clutch power. This is achieved through interference fits. The studs on top are slightly larger than the space between the tubes underneath. When you press them together, the plastic slightly deforms and then “hugs” the stud, creating friction. The tolerance for this fit is incredibly tight: 0.002 millimeters. If the mold varies by even a hair’s breadth, the bricks won’t click properly. 2. They Are Virtually Indestructible A study published in the journal Ecological Engineering estimated that a single LEGO brick could survive in the ocean for anywhere from 100 to 1,300 years before fully breaking down. This is due to the stability of ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), a robust thermoplastic that resists chemical erosion and impact. 3. The Tower of Compression How many bricks can you stack before the bottom one gets crushed? The average 2x4 LEGO brick can withstand a force of about 4,240 Newtons (roughly 950 pounds). Mathematically, you could stack approximately 375,000 bricks on top of one another before the bottom brick structural integrity fails. That tower would be about 3.5 kilometers (2.17 miles) high—way taller than Mount Olympus! Are you looking for a cool science present? Check out the last slides (and for more in our bio). We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.

@sciencefunn
69K
212
739 likesVS69K likes 🏆

sciencefunn has 68.3K more likes on their top post

Estrategia de Hashtags

Uso de Hashtags Más Fuerte
@brilliantorg

6

Con Hashtags

6

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación4.0
Prom. Likes366
Prom. Comentarios4
Los hashtags aumentan el engagement
#stem#math#coding#school#education
@sciencefunn

0

Con Hashtags

12

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación0.0
Prom. Likes0
Prom. Comentarios0
Los hashtags no muestran un aumento claro

@brilliantorg muestra mayor impacto de hashtags

Tendencias de Engagement

Tendencia Más Fuerte
@brilliantorg
Estable

+2.9%

Cambio en engagement

-5%

Likes

+517%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas259
Prom. publicaciones recientes267
@sciencefunn
En descenso

-95.2%

Cambio en engagement

-95%

Likes

-74%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas44K
Prom. publicaciones recientes2.1K

@brilliantorg muestra mejor momentum reciente

Ritmo de Publicación

@brilliantorg

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Thursday
Consistencia31%

@sciencefunn

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Sunday
Consistencia27%

La puntuación de consistencia refleja la regularidad de publicación. Más alta = horario más confiable para la audiencia.

Veredicto Experto

Veredicto General:

@sciencefunn lidera en la mayoría de las métricas clave.

La comparación muestra que @sciencefunn supera a @brilliantorg notablemente en Seguidores.

Seguidores

@sciencefunn domina en alcance y volumen de seguidores.

Tasa de Engagement

@sciencefunn entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.

Resumen Rápido

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Comparaciones Populares

Mira cómo se enfrentan estas cuentas

Preguntas Frecuentes sobre Resultados

Preguntas Frecuentes: @brilliantorg vs @sciencefunn

Preguntas específicas sobre esta comparación cara a cara

¿Aún tienes dudas?

Contáctanos

Comparaciones populares: @brilliantorg vs @sciencefunn

brilliantorg vs sciencefunnbrilliantorg vs sciencefunn Instagrambrilliantorg y sciencefunn comparaciónComparar brilliantorg con sciencefunnbrilliantorg versus sciencefunn en Instagrambrilliantorg vs sciencefunn número de seguidoresbrilliantorg vs sciencefunn tasa de engagementbrilliantorg sciencefunn estadísticas Instagrambrilliantorg o sciencefunn – ¿quién gana?brilliantorg vs sciencefunn análisisbrilliantorg sciencefunn ¿quién es mejor?brilliantorg vs sciencefunn cara a caraBrilliant.org vs Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoBrilliant.org Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko comparaciónComparar Brilliant.org y Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoBrilliant.org versus Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko