iflscience
nasawebb

Comparación de perfiles de Instagram de IFLScience y NASA Webb Telescope. Seguidores, interacción, actividad y rendimiento comparados.

VS

Resumen de Perfiles

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@iflscience

95

Excellent

Account Health

@nasawebb

100

Excellent

Instagram profile picture of @iflscience

IFLScience

@iflscience

The lighter side of science 🚀 For more science news click here 👇👇👇👇

696.1K

Seguidores

16%

309

Siguiendo

10.7K

Publicaciones

89%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación📉 Trailing
Leader
Instagram profile picture of @nasawebb

NASA Webb Telescope

@nasawebb

The Official *NASA* James Webb Space Telescope account Launch: Dec. 25, 2021. First images: July 12, 2022.

3.5M

Seguidores

84%

34

Siguiendo

1.3K

Publicaciones

11%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación🔝 Leading

Métricas Clave Cara a Cara

@iflscience
2
Trailing on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 2 Ahead
@nasawebb
4
Winning on metrics
@iflscience
Detailed Breakdown
@nasawebb
696.1K
Seguidores
80% ahead
3.5M
309
Siguiendo
89% ahead
34
10.7K
Total Publicaciones
88% ahead
1.3K
0.05%
Tasa de Engagement
97% ahead
2.15%
375
Prom. Likes
100% ahead
75.8K
3
Prom. Comentarios
99% ahead
225
iflscience2 - 4🏆 nasawebb

Métricas Avanzadas

Puntuación de Autoridad
65
Expert
@iflscience
Reach20/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Puntuación de Autoridad
Winner
82
Elite
@nasawebb
Reach22/25
Engagement15/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10

Nivel de Cuenta

Large

696.1K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@iflscience

Mega

3.5M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@nasawebb

Índice de Influencia
60
/ 100
@iflscience
Índice de Influencia
Ganador
76
/ 100
@nasawebb

Calidad de Engagement

@iflscience

0.05%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

@nasawebb

2.15%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Average

Ratio Siguiendo/Seguidores

@iflscience

1:2.3K

Very influential

Excellent

@nasawebb

1:104.2K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@iflscience0.8%
@nasawebb0.3%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@iflscience0.5
@nasawebb21.4

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Densidad de Contenido(posts per 1K followers)

@iflscience

15.34

Very Active

@nasawebb

0.36

Moderate

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

iflscience40
nasawebb53
Difference: 13 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

iflscience40
nasawebb53
Difference: 13 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

iflscience1
nasawebb21
Difference: 21 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

iflscience35
nasawebb70
Difference: 35 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Publicaciones Top

Top post by @iflscience

Only 1% of people will get this joke 🫠🫠

@iflscience
1.2K
6
Ganador
Top post by @nasawebb

Don’t let anyone dull your shine 💫 The heart of galaxy M77 is shining so brightly in this Webb telescope image, it nearly outshines the galaxy itself. The intense glow is due to gas being pulled into a tight and rapid orbit around the central black hole. The motion of the gas heats it up, releasing tremendous amounts of radiation. The first image is Webb’s mid-infrared view with swirling filaments of dust shown in blue. The glowing orange bubbles along the arms are being carved out by newly-formed star clusters. In the second image, the near-infrared reveals a bar spanning 6,000 light-years across the central region. This bar is enclosed by a bright ring, called a starburst ring, formed by the inner ends of the galaxy’s two spiral arms. Starburst regions in galaxies are zones of high star formation rates. The third image is a composite image, combining both mid and near-infrared shots into one. Those bright orange lines radiating out of the center of all images are diffraction spikes, an optical effect caused by the telescope itself. When observing a bright object such as a star, the light gets slightly bent (or diffracted) around some of the telescope’s structures. Due to Webb’s optics, its images have a six-plus-two-pointed pattern around bright objects. Hubble images have four-pointed patterns due to its structure. Credit: ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, A. Leroy #NASA #Webb #Galaxy

@nasawebb
734.1K
1.8K
1.2K likesVS734.1K likes 🏆

nasawebb has 732.9K more likes on their top post

Estrategia de Hashtags

@iflscience

0

Con Hashtags

12

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación0.0
Prom. Likes0
Prom. Comentarios0
Los hashtags no muestran un aumento claro
Uso de Hashtags Más Fuerte
@nasawebb

4

Con Hashtags

8

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación1.5
Prom. Likes199K
Prom. Comentarios498
Los hashtags aumentan el engagement
#space#nasa#beautiful#galaxy#universe

@nasawebb muestra mayor impacto de hashtags

Tendencias de Engagement

Tendencia Más Fuerte
@iflscience
En descenso

-29.2%

Cambio en engagement

-29%

Likes

-5%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas443
Prom. publicaciones recientes313
@nasawebb
En descenso

-86.0%

Cambio en engagement

-86%

Likes

-80%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas133.5K
Prom. publicaciones recientes18.6K

@iflscience muestra mejor momentum reciente

Ritmo de Publicación

@iflscience

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Sunday
Consistencia59%

@nasawebb

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Friday
Consistencia39%

La puntuación de consistencia refleja la regularidad de publicación. Más alta = horario más confiable para la audiencia.

Veredicto Experto

Veredicto General:

@nasawebb lidera en la mayoría de las métricas clave.

La comparación muestra que @nasawebb supera a @iflscience notablemente en Seguidores.

Seguidores

@nasawebb domina en alcance y volumen de seguidores.

Tasa de Engagement

@nasawebb entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.

Resumen Rápido

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Comparaciones Populares

Mira cómo se enfrentan estas cuentas

Preguntas Frecuentes sobre Resultados

Preguntas Frecuentes: @iflscience vs @nasawebb

Preguntas específicas sobre esta comparación cara a cara

¿Aún tienes dudas?

Contáctanos

Comparaciones populares: @iflscience vs @nasawebb

iflscience vs nasawebbiflscience vs nasawebb Instagramiflscience y nasawebb comparaciónComparar iflscience con nasawebbiflscience versus nasawebb en Instagramiflscience vs nasawebb número de seguidoresiflscience vs nasawebb tasa de engagementiflscience nasawebb estadísticas Instagramiflscience o nasawebb – ¿quién gana?iflscience vs nasawebb análisisiflscience nasawebb ¿quién es mejor?iflscience vs nasawebb cara a caraIFLScience vs NASA Webb TelescopeIFLScience NASA Webb Telescope comparaciónComparar IFLScience y NASA Webb TelescopeIFLScience versus NASA Webb Telescope