Comparación de perfiles de Instagram de IFLScience y The Nature Conservancy. Seguidores, interacción, actividad y rendimiento comparados.
Resumen de Perfiles
Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators
Account Health
@iflscience
95
Excellent
Account Health
@nature_org
95
Excellent
696.1K
Seguidores
42%
309
Siguiendo
10.7K
Publicaciones
72%
Healthy ratio
975.6K
Seguidores
58%
629
Siguiendo
4.2K
Publicaciones
28%
Healthy ratio
Métricas Clave Cara a Cara
Métricas Avanzadas
Nivel de Cuenta
696.1K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@iflscience
975.6K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@nature_org
Calidad de Engagement
@iflscience
0.05%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@nature_org
0.10%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Ratio Siguiendo/Seguidores
@iflscience
1:2.3K
Very influential
@nature_org
1:1.6K
Very influential
Comment-to-Like Ratio
Higher = more thoughtful engagement
Virality Potential
Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)
Densidad de Contenido(posts per 1K followers)
@iflscience
15.34
Very Active@nature_org
4.31
ActiveJolygram Intelligence Metrics
Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns
Growth Velocity Index
Recent growth momentum
Audience Quality Score
Quality of follower base
Content Performance Index
Engagement per follower
Overall Influence Index
Combined influence potential
Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.
Publicaciones Top
Diversity drives the natural world, and it drives us at The Nature Conservancy, too. 🌈 This Pride Month, we celebrate our LGBTQ+ colleagues and the role they play in advancing our mission for a healthier planet. A stronger, more inclusive community helps both nature and people thrive. Happy Pride Month!
nature_org has 976 more likes on their top post
Estrategia de Hashtags
0
Con Hashtags
12
Sin Hashtags
2
Con Hashtags
10
Sin Hashtags
@nature_org muestra mayor impacto de hashtags
Tendencias de Engagement
-29.2%
Cambio en engagement
Likes
Comentarios
+10.5%
Cambio en engagement
Likes
Comentarios
@nature_org muestra mejor momentum reciente
Ritmo de Publicación
@iflscience
@nature_org
La puntuación de consistencia refleja la regularidad de publicación. Más alta = horario más confiable para la audiencia.
Veredicto Experto
Veredicto General:
@nature_org lidera en la mayoría de las métricas clave.
Seguidores
@nature_org domina en alcance y volumen de seguidores.
Tasa de Engagement
@nature_org entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.
Resumen Rápido
Data updated based on recent public posts.
Comparaciones Populares
Mira cómo se enfrentan estas cuentas
Preguntas Frecuentes: @iflscience vs @nature_org
Preguntas específicas sobre esta comparación cara a cara
¿Aún tienes dudas?
Contáctanos