iflscience
sciencefunn

Comparación de perfiles de Instagram de IFLScience y Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko. Seguidores, interacción, actividad y rendimiento comparados.

VS

Resumen de Perfiles

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@iflscience

95

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencefunn

100

Excellent

Instagram profile picture of @iflscience

IFLScience

@iflscience

The lighter side of science 🚀 For more science news click here 👇👇👇👇

696.1K

Seguidores

20%

309

Siguiendo

10.7K

Publicaciones

91%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación📉 Trailing
Leader
Instagram profile picture of @sciencefunn

Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko

@sciencefunn

Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:

2.8M

Seguidores

80%

327

Siguiendo

1K

Publicaciones

9%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación🔝 Leading

Métricas Clave Cara a Cara

@iflscience
1
Trailing on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 2 Ahead
@sciencefunn
5
Winning on metrics
@iflscience
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencefunn
696.1K
Seguidores
75% ahead
2.8M
309
Siguiendo
6% ahead
327
10.7K
Total Publicaciones
90% ahead
1K
0.05%
Tasa de Engagement
93% ahead
0.83%
375
Prom. Likes
98% ahead
22.9K
3
Prom. Comentarios
98% ahead
174
iflscience1 - 5🏆 sciencefunn

Métricas Avanzadas

Puntuación de Autoridad
Winner
65
Expert
@iflscience
Reach20/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Puntuación de Autoridad
62
Expert
@sciencefunn
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

Nivel de Cuenta

Large

696.1K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@iflscience

Mega

2.8M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@sciencefunn

Índice de Influencia
Ganador
60
/ 100
@iflscience
Índice de Influencia
54
/ 100
@sciencefunn

Calidad de Engagement

@iflscience

0.05%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

@sciencefunn

0.83%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Ratio Siguiendo/Seguidores

@iflscience

1:2.3K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencefunn

1:8.5K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@iflscience0.8%
@sciencefunn0.8%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@iflscience0.5
@sciencefunn8.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Densidad de Contenido(posts per 1K followers)

@iflscience

15.34

Very Active

@sciencefunn

0.38

Moderate

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

iflscience40
sciencefunn45
Difference: 5 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

iflscience40
sciencefunn45
Difference: 5 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

iflscience1
sciencefunn8
Difference: 8 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

iflscience35
sciencefunn65
Difference: 30 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Publicaciones Top

Top post by @iflscience

Only 1% of people will get this joke 🫠🫠

@iflscience
1.2K
6
Ganador
Top post by @sciencefunn

LEGO isn’t just a toy; it’s a masterclass in high-precision engineering and materials science. Here are some of the coolest science-based facts about those iconic plastic bricks. 1. The Physics of “Clutch Power” The reason LEGO bricks snap together and stay together is due to a mechanical property called clutch power. This is achieved through interference fits. The studs on top are slightly larger than the space between the tubes underneath. When you press them together, the plastic slightly deforms and then “hugs” the stud, creating friction. The tolerance for this fit is incredibly tight: 0.002 millimeters. If the mold varies by even a hair’s breadth, the bricks won’t click properly. 2. They Are Virtually Indestructible A study published in the journal Ecological Engineering estimated that a single LEGO brick could survive in the ocean for anywhere from 100 to 1,300 years before fully breaking down. This is due to the stability of ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), a robust thermoplastic that resists chemical erosion and impact. 3. The Tower of Compression How many bricks can you stack before the bottom one gets crushed? The average 2x4 LEGO brick can withstand a force of about 4,240 Newtons (roughly 950 pounds). Mathematically, you could stack approximately 375,000 bricks on top of one another before the bottom brick structural integrity fails. That tower would be about 3.5 kilometers (2.17 miles) high—way taller than Mount Olympus! Are you looking for a cool science present? Check out the last slides (and for more in our bio). We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.

@sciencefunn
69K
212
1.2K likesVS69K likes 🏆

sciencefunn has 67.9K more likes on their top post

Estrategia de Hashtags

@iflscience

0

Con Hashtags

12

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación0.0
Prom. Likes0
Prom. Comentarios0
Los hashtags no muestran un aumento claro
@sciencefunn

0

Con Hashtags

12

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación0.0
Prom. Likes0
Prom. Comentarios0
Los hashtags no muestran un aumento claro

Tendencias de Engagement

Tendencia Más Fuerte
@iflscience
En descenso

-29.2%

Cambio en engagement

-29%

Likes

-5%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas443
Prom. publicaciones recientes313
@sciencefunn
En descenso

-95.2%

Cambio en engagement

-95%

Likes

-74%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas44K
Prom. publicaciones recientes2.1K

@iflscience muestra mejor momentum reciente

Ritmo de Publicación

@iflscience

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Sunday
Consistencia59%

@sciencefunn

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Sunday
Consistencia27%

La puntuación de consistencia refleja la regularidad de publicación. Más alta = horario más confiable para la audiencia.

Veredicto Experto

Veredicto General:

@sciencefunn lidera en la mayoría de las métricas clave.

La comparación muestra que @sciencefunn supera a @iflscience notablemente en Seguidores.

Seguidores

@sciencefunn domina en alcance y volumen de seguidores.

Tasa de Engagement

@sciencefunn entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.

Resumen Rápido

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Comparaciones Populares

Mira cómo se enfrentan estas cuentas

Preguntas Frecuentes sobre Resultados

Preguntas Frecuentes: @iflscience vs @sciencefunn

Preguntas específicas sobre esta comparación cara a cara

¿Aún tienes dudas?

Contáctanos

Comparaciones populares: @iflscience vs @sciencefunn

iflscience vs sciencefunniflscience vs sciencefunn Instagramiflscience y sciencefunn comparaciónComparar iflscience con sciencefunniflscience versus sciencefunn en Instagramiflscience vs sciencefunn número de seguidoresiflscience vs sciencefunn tasa de engagementiflscience sciencefunn estadísticas Instagramiflscience o sciencefunn – ¿quién gana?iflscience vs sciencefunn análisisiflscience sciencefunn ¿quién es mejor?iflscience vs sciencefunn cara a caraIFLScience vs Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoIFLScience Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko comparaciónComparar IFLScience y Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoIFLScience versus Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko