nasawebb
sciencefunn

Comparación de perfiles de Instagram de NASA Webb Telescope y Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko. Seguidores, interacción, actividad y rendimiento comparados.

VS

Resumen de Perfiles

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@nasawebb

100

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencefunn

100

Excellent

Leader
Instagram profile picture of @nasawebb

NASA Webb Telescope

@nasawebb

The Official *NASA* James Webb Space Telescope account Launch: Dec. 25, 2021. First images: July 12, 2022.

3.5M

Seguidores

56%

34

Siguiendo

1.3K

Publicaciones

55%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación🔝 Leading
Instagram profile picture of @sciencefunn

Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko

@sciencefunn

Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:

2.8M

Seguidores

44%

327

Siguiendo

1K

Publicaciones

45%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación📉 Trailing

Métricas Clave Cara a Cara

@nasawebb
5
Winning on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 1 Ahead
@sciencefunn
1
Trailing on metrics
@nasawebb
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencefunn
3.5M
Seguidores
22% ahead
2.8M
34
Siguiendo
90% ahead
327
1.3K
Total Publicaciones
19% ahead
1K
2.15%
Tasa de Engagement
61% ahead
0.83%
75.8K
Prom. Likes
70% ahead
22.9K
225
Prom. Comentarios
23% ahead
174
🏆 nasawebb5 - 1sciencefunn

Métricas Avanzadas

Puntuación de Autoridad
Winner
82
Elite
@nasawebb
Reach22/25
Engagement15/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Puntuación de Autoridad
62
Expert
@sciencefunn
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

Nivel de Cuenta

Mega

3.5M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@nasawebb

Mega

2.8M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@sciencefunn

Índice de Influencia
Ganador
76
/ 100
@nasawebb
Índice de Influencia
54
/ 100
@sciencefunn

Calidad de Engagement

@nasawebb

2.15%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Average

@sciencefunn

0.83%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Ratio Siguiendo/Seguidores

@nasawebb

1:104.2K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencefunn

1:8.5K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@nasawebb0.3%
@sciencefunn0.8%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@nasawebb21.4
@sciencefunn8.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Densidad de Contenido(posts per 1K followers)

@nasawebb

0.36

Moderate

@sciencefunn

0.38

Moderate

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

nasawebb53
sciencefunn45
Difference: 8 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

nasawebb53
sciencefunn45
Difference: 8 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

nasawebb21
sciencefunn8
Difference: 13 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

nasawebb70
sciencefunn65
Difference: 5 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Publicaciones Top

Ganador
Top post by @nasawebb

Don’t let anyone dull your shine 💫 The heart of galaxy M77 is shining so brightly in this Webb telescope image, it nearly outshines the galaxy itself. The intense glow is due to gas being pulled into a tight and rapid orbit around the central black hole. The motion of the gas heats it up, releasing tremendous amounts of radiation. The first image is Webb’s mid-infrared view with swirling filaments of dust shown in blue. The glowing orange bubbles along the arms are being carved out by newly-formed star clusters. In the second image, the near-infrared reveals a bar spanning 6,000 light-years across the central region. This bar is enclosed by a bright ring, called a starburst ring, formed by the inner ends of the galaxy’s two spiral arms. Starburst regions in galaxies are zones of high star formation rates. The third image is a composite image, combining both mid and near-infrared shots into one. Those bright orange lines radiating out of the center of all images are diffraction spikes, an optical effect caused by the telescope itself. When observing a bright object such as a star, the light gets slightly bent (or diffracted) around some of the telescope’s structures. Due to Webb’s optics, its images have a six-plus-two-pointed pattern around bright objects. Hubble images have four-pointed patterns due to its structure. Credit: ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, A. Leroy #NASA #Webb #Galaxy

@nasawebb
734.1K
1.8K
Top post by @sciencefunn

LEGO isn’t just a toy; it’s a masterclass in high-precision engineering and materials science. Here are some of the coolest science-based facts about those iconic plastic bricks. 1. The Physics of “Clutch Power” The reason LEGO bricks snap together and stay together is due to a mechanical property called clutch power. This is achieved through interference fits. The studs on top are slightly larger than the space between the tubes underneath. When you press them together, the plastic slightly deforms and then “hugs” the stud, creating friction. The tolerance for this fit is incredibly tight: 0.002 millimeters. If the mold varies by even a hair’s breadth, the bricks won’t click properly. 2. They Are Virtually Indestructible A study published in the journal Ecological Engineering estimated that a single LEGO brick could survive in the ocean for anywhere from 100 to 1,300 years before fully breaking down. This is due to the stability of ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), a robust thermoplastic that resists chemical erosion and impact. 3. The Tower of Compression How many bricks can you stack before the bottom one gets crushed? The average 2x4 LEGO brick can withstand a force of about 4,240 Newtons (roughly 950 pounds). Mathematically, you could stack approximately 375,000 bricks on top of one another before the bottom brick structural integrity fails. That tower would be about 3.5 kilometers (2.17 miles) high—way taller than Mount Olympus! Are you looking for a cool science present? Check out the last slides (and for more in our bio). We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.

@sciencefunn
69K
212
🏆 734.1K likesVS69K likes

nasawebb has 665.1K more likes on their top post

Estrategia de Hashtags

Uso de Hashtags Más Fuerte
@nasawebb

4

Con Hashtags

8

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación1.5
Prom. Likes199K
Prom. Comentarios498
Los hashtags aumentan el engagement
#space#nasa#beautiful#galaxy#universe
@sciencefunn

0

Con Hashtags

12

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación0.0
Prom. Likes0
Prom. Comentarios0
Los hashtags no muestran un aumento claro

@nasawebb muestra mayor impacto de hashtags

Tendencias de Engagement

Tendencia Más Fuerte
@nasawebb
En descenso

-86.0%

Cambio en engagement

-86%

Likes

-80%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas133.5K
Prom. publicaciones recientes18.6K
@sciencefunn
En descenso

-95.2%

Cambio en engagement

-95%

Likes

-74%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas44K
Prom. publicaciones recientes2.1K

@nasawebb muestra mejor momentum reciente

Ritmo de Publicación

@nasawebb

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Friday
Consistencia39%

@sciencefunn

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Sunday
Consistencia27%

La puntuación de consistencia refleja la regularidad de publicación. Más alta = horario más confiable para la audiencia.

Veredicto Experto

Veredicto General:

@nasawebb lidera en la mayoría de las métricas clave.

La comparación muestra que @nasawebb supera a @sciencefunn notablemente en Seguidores.

Seguidores

@nasawebb domina en alcance y volumen de seguidores.

Tasa de Engagement

@nasawebb entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.

Resumen Rápido

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Comparaciones Populares

Mira cómo se enfrentan estas cuentas

Preguntas Frecuentes sobre Resultados

Preguntas Frecuentes: @nasawebb vs @sciencefunn

Preguntas específicas sobre esta comparación cara a cara

¿Aún tienes dudas?

Contáctanos

Comparaciones populares: @nasawebb vs @sciencefunn

nasawebb vs sciencefunnnasawebb vs sciencefunn Instagramnasawebb y sciencefunn comparaciónComparar nasawebb con sciencefunnnasawebb versus sciencefunn en Instagramnasawebb vs sciencefunn número de seguidoresnasawebb vs sciencefunn tasa de engagementnasawebb sciencefunn estadísticas Instagramnasawebb o sciencefunn – ¿quién gana?nasawebb vs sciencefunn análisisnasawebb sciencefunn ¿quién es mejor?nasawebb vs sciencefunn cara a caraNASA Webb Telescope vs Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoNASA Webb Telescope Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko comparaciónComparar NASA Webb Telescope y Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoNASA Webb Telescope versus Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko