gq
rollingstone

GQとRolling StoneのInstagramプロフィールを並べて比較。フォロワー、エンゲージメント、アクティビティ、パフォーマンスを比較。

VS

プロフィール概要

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@gq

100

Excellent

Account Health

@rollingstone

100

Excellent

Instagram profile picture of @gq

GQ

@gq

Big fits start here. @gqsports @gqrecommends @gqbox

7.2M

フォロワー

46%

989

フォロー中

18.3K

投稿

54%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
比較📉 Trailing
Leader
Instagram profile picture of @rollingstone

Rolling Stone

@rollingstone

8.6M

フォロワー

54%

631

フォロー中

15.7K

投稿

46%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
比較🔝 Leading

主要メトリクス対決

@gq
2
Trailing on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 2 Ahead
@rollingstone
4
Winning on metrics
@gq
Detailed Breakdown
@rollingstone
7.2M
フォロワー
16% ahead
8.6M
989
フォロー中
36% ahead
631
18.3K
総投稿数
14% ahead
15.7K
0.33%
エンゲージメント率
64% ahead
0.92%
23.6K
平均いいね数
70% ahead
78.5K
84
平均コメント数
87% ahead
668
gq2 - 4🏆 rollingstone

高度メトリクス

権威スコア
70
Expert
@gq
Reach22/25
Engagement3/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
権威スコア
Winner
72
Expert
@rollingstone
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10

アカウントティア

Mega

7.2M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@gq

Mega

8.6M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@rollingstone

影響力インデックス
67
/ 100
@gq
影響力インデックス
勝者
70
/ 100
@rollingstone

エンゲージメント品質

@gq

0.33%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

@rollingstone

0.92%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

フォロー中/フォロワー比率

@gq

1:7.3K

Very influential

Excellent

@rollingstone

1:13.6K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@gq0.4%
@rollingstone0.9%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@gq3.3
@rollingstone9.1

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

コンテンツ密度(posts per 1K followers)

@gq

2.54

Active

@rollingstone

1.83

Active

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

gq42
rollingstone46
Difference: 4 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

gq42
rollingstone46
Difference: 4 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

gq3
rollingstone9
Difference: 6 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

gq65
rollingstone68
Difference: 3 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

トップ投稿

Top post by @gq

There is nothing else that currently exists in filmmaking like a Christopher Nolan production. “If you’re lucky enough to succeed with a project,” the director explains, “you kind of have a responsibility as a filmmaker to try and say, ‘Okay, what can I do? What am I allowed to do now that maybe I wouldn’t have been allowed to do before or somebody else wouldn’t be allowed to do?’” “Obviously, coming off the back of the success of Oppenheimer, it was like, All right, we’ve got to use this opportunity to try and really do the most ambitious thing that we can.” Nolan soon decided the most ambitious thing he could do was: adapt Homer’s Odyssey. At the link in bio, read GQ’s Summer cover story on how Hollywood’s three leading-est men Matt Damon, Robert Pattinson, and Tom Holland led a cast and crew of hundreds to help Nolan create his most epic and ambitious blockbuster to date. Story by @zachbaron Photographs by @alexprager Styled by @georgecortina Hair by @teddycharleshair at Nevermind Skin by @jostrettell at Walter Schupfer Management Set design by @joneslikeindiana Tailoring by Yelena Travkina and Susanna Badalyan Key Gaffer by @mick411 Key Grip by @Clayton_n_iii Retouching by @bermudezstudio Produced by @campproductions

@gq
62.7K
142
勝者
Top post by @rollingstone

Presenting Rolling Stone’s biggest cover ever: @bts.bighitofficial for May 2026 💜 How did the world’s biggest band reclaim their crown? By overcoming doubt & returning to their roots on an adventurous album. Our issue features eight different covers: one featuring #BTS, and one for each member. For today’s cover story, #방탄소년단 sat down with @hiattb for a deep dive about their new album and reuniting. Come back tomorrow (and each day after) for a solo cover real + new video interview + new cover story. ON SALE NOW: The ‘BTS: The Cover Collection’ brings all 8 covers together in one set, the best way to secure the full collection. Tap to shop, while supplies last. Writer @hiattb Photographer @pakbae Editors in Chief @seanfwoods & @shirleyhalperin Executive Music Editor Christian Hoard Creative Director @joe_hutchinson Director of Photography @jennsantana Director of Social & Video @waiss_aramesh Associate Director of Social Media @leahluser Executive Producer @chriskimfilm Producer/colorist @mitchsaavedra Senior Product Designer @nthompson89 Senior Visuals Editor @photoeditorjoe Styling @yeyewrks Hair @bit.boot_hansom @bit.boot_kimhwayeon @ozikc Makeup @da_a_reum @shinae.lee Set Designer @yeabyul Production by @_nuhana Nuhana Executive Producer @sooh_hwang Nuhana Producers Producer @sebbbing @Kalegno Nuhana Line Producer @_justcallmecherry RS video DoP @mikebeechfilm Gaffer/Camera Operator Wonman Kim Camera Operators: Byeong Hwi Min, Churl Gwon, Hyunsuh Paik DIT: Jiwoon Lee Sound operator: Min Jae Lee Digital Technician Huijin Kim Post-Production @glossnewyork Photo Assistance: Soojung Oh, Minhyuk Lee, Minjun Kim, Jihyun Oh, Juwan Kang, Junhyung Yang Set Design assistance: Sohyun Won, Yunseon Choi, Junhyuk Sim Production assistant Seohyun Yoon

@rollingstone
765.7K
6.9K
62.7K likesVS765.7K likes 🏆

rollingstone has 703K more likes on their top post

ハッシュタグ戦略

@gq

1

ハッシュタグあり

11

ハッシュタグなし

投稿あたり平均0.2
平均いいね数15.3K
平均コメント数45
ハッシュタグに明確な効果なし
#twilight#batman
より優れたハッシュタグ戦略
@rollingstone

1

ハッシュタグあり

11

ハッシュタグなし

投稿あたり平均0.1
平均いいね数765.7K
平均コメント数6.9K
ハッシュタグ使用でエンゲージメント向上
#bts

@rollingstone の方がハッシュタグ効果が強い

エンゲージメントトレンド

より強いトレンド
@gq
下降中

-57.0%

エンゲージメント変化

-57%

いいね

-65%

コメント

古い投稿平均33.1K
最近の投稿平均14.2K
@rollingstone
下降中

-94.5%

エンゲージメント変化

-94%

いいね

-97%

コメント

古い投稿平均150.2K
最近の投稿平均8.3K

@gq の方が最近の勢いが強い

投稿リズム

@gq

週あたり投稿数
12.0
投稿間平均日数
0.0
最もアクティブな曜日
Tuesday
一貫性16%

@rollingstone

週あたり投稿数
12.0
投稿間平均日数
0.0
最もアクティブな曜日
Wednesday
一貫性12%

一貫性スコアは投稿の規則性を反映。高いほどオーディエンスにとって信頼できるスケジュール。

専門家判定

総合判定:

@rollingstoneがほとんどの主要メトリクスでリードしています。

比較の結果、@rollingstoneがエンゲージメント率で特に@gqを上回っています。

フォロワー

@rollingstoneがリーチとフォロワー数で圧倒しています。

エンゲージメント率

@rollingstoneがオーディエンス規模に対してより高いエンゲージメントを示しています。

クイックサマリー

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

人気の比較

これらのアカウントがどう競い合っているか見てみよう

結果FAQ

FAQ:@gq vs @rollingstone

このヘッド・トゥ・ヘッド比較に関する具体的な質問

まだ質問がありますか?

お問い合わせ

@gq vs @rollingstone の人気比較

gq vs rollingstonegq vs rollingstone インスタgq と rollingstone 比較gq と rollingstone どっちが強い?gq 対 rollingstone Instagramgq vs rollingstone フォロワー数gq vs rollingstone エンゲージメント率gq rollingstone インスタ比較gq か rollingstone どっち?gq vs rollingstone 統計gq rollingstone どっちが人気?gq vs rollingstone 徹底比較GQ vs Rolling StoneGQ Rolling Stone 比較GQ と Rolling Stone どっちがいい?GQ 対 Rolling Stone