nasahubble
sciencefunn

Hubble Space TelescopeとScience Is Fun By Tomas RoskoのInstagramプロフィールを並べて比較。フォロワー、エンゲージメント、アクティビティ、パフォーマンスを比較。

VS

プロフィール概要

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@nasahubble

100

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencefunn

100

Excellent

Leader
Instagram profile picture of @nasahubble

Hubble Space Telescope

@nasahubble

Welcome to the official account for NASA's Hubble Space Telescope! The observatory and account are operated by @nasagoddard.

6.7M

フォロワー

71%

17

フォロー中

2.1K

投稿

67%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
比較🔝 Leading
Instagram profile picture of @sciencefunn

Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko

@sciencefunn

Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:

2.8M

フォロワー

29%

327

フォロー中

1K

投稿

33%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
比較📉 Trailing

主要メトリクス対決

@nasahubble
3
Tied on metrics
Competition
VS
Even Match
@sciencefunn
3
Tied on metrics
@nasahubble
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencefunn
6.7M
フォロワー
58% ahead
2.8M
17
フォロー中
95% ahead
327
2.1K
総投稿数
50% ahead
1K
0.39%
エンゲージメント率
54% ahead
0.83%
25.7K
平均いいね数
11% ahead
22.9K
79
平均コメント数
55% ahead
174
nasahubble3 - 3sciencefunn

高度メトリクス

権威スコア
Winner
70
Expert
@nasahubble
Reach22/25
Engagement3/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
権威スコア
62
Expert
@sciencefunn
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

アカウントティア

Mega

6.7M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@nasahubble

Mega

2.8M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@sciencefunn

影響力インデックス
勝者
67
/ 100
@nasahubble
影響力インデックス
54
/ 100
@sciencefunn

エンゲージメント品質

@nasahubble

0.39%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

@sciencefunn

0.83%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

フォロー中/フォロワー比率

@nasahubble

1:391.5K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencefunn

1:8.5K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@nasahubble0.3%
@sciencefunn0.8%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@nasahubble3.9
@sciencefunn8.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

コンテンツ密度(posts per 1K followers)

@nasahubble

0.31

Moderate

@sciencefunn

0.38

Moderate

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

nasahubble42
sciencefunn45
Difference: 3 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

nasahubble42
sciencefunn45
Difference: 3 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

nasahubble4
sciencefunn8
Difference: 4 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

nasahubble65
sciencefunn65

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

トップ投稿

Top post by @nasahubble

City of stars, are you shining just for me? This new Hubble view shows a spiral galaxy called M88, located about 63 million light-years away. M88 is an active galaxy, which means that its center holds a supermassive black hole that snacks on gas and dust. Astronomers estimate the black hole is around 100 million times as massive as our Sun! Older stars around the black hole give M88 its warmly glowing heart. The galaxy's core is surrounded by tightly wound, symmetrical spiral arms, outlined by bright pink and blue star clusters and knotted clouds of dust. Uncover more at the link in our bio! Image description: Spread across two slides is a large spiral galaxy. It is seen tilted at an angle, so that it is foreshortened and appears very wide. Its tightly-wound, blue spiral arms swirl out from its glowing center, spreading apart at the tips. They are followed by strands and clumps of dark red dust and spotted with pink dots where stars are forming in clouds of gas. The galaxy is surrounded by a slight glow and lies on a dark background. Image credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, D. Thilker #NASA #Hubble #galaxy #space #science

@nasahubble
39.7K
100
勝者
Top post by @sciencefunn

LEGO isn’t just a toy; it’s a masterclass in high-precision engineering and materials science. Here are some of the coolest science-based facts about those iconic plastic bricks. 1. The Physics of “Clutch Power” The reason LEGO bricks snap together and stay together is due to a mechanical property called clutch power. This is achieved through interference fits. The studs on top are slightly larger than the space between the tubes underneath. When you press them together, the plastic slightly deforms and then “hugs” the stud, creating friction. The tolerance for this fit is incredibly tight: 0.002 millimeters. If the mold varies by even a hair’s breadth, the bricks won’t click properly. 2. They Are Virtually Indestructible A study published in the journal Ecological Engineering estimated that a single LEGO brick could survive in the ocean for anywhere from 100 to 1,300 years before fully breaking down. This is due to the stability of ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), a robust thermoplastic that resists chemical erosion and impact. 3. The Tower of Compression How many bricks can you stack before the bottom one gets crushed? The average 2x4 LEGO brick can withstand a force of about 4,240 Newtons (roughly 950 pounds). Mathematically, you could stack approximately 375,000 bricks on top of one another before the bottom brick structural integrity fails. That tower would be about 3.5 kilometers (2.17 miles) high—way taller than Mount Olympus! Are you looking for a cool science present? Check out the last slides (and for more in our bio). We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.

@sciencefunn
69K
212
39.7K likesVS69K likes 🏆

sciencefunn has 29.3K more likes on their top post

ハッシュタグ戦略

より優れたハッシュタグ戦略
@nasahubble

12

ハッシュタグあり

0

ハッシュタグなし

投稿あたり平均5.0
平均いいね数25.7K
平均コメント数79
ハッシュタグ使用でエンゲージメント向上
#nasa#hubble#space#galaxy#hubbleclassic
@sciencefunn

0

ハッシュタグあり

12

ハッシュタグなし

投稿あたり平均0.0
平均いいね数0
平均コメント数0
ハッシュタグに明確な効果なし

@nasahubble の方がハッシュタグ効果が強い

エンゲージメントトレンド

より強いトレンド
@nasahubble
上昇中

+19.2%

エンゲージメント変化

+19%

いいね

+19%

コメント

古い投稿平均23.5K
最近の投稿平均28K
@sciencefunn
下降中

-95.2%

エンゲージメント変化

-95%

いいね

-74%

コメント

古い投稿平均44K
最近の投稿平均2.1K

@nasahubble の方が最近の勢いが強い

投稿リズム

@nasahubble

週あたり投稿数
12.0
投稿間平均日数
0.0
最もアクティブな曜日
Wednesday
一貫性53%

@sciencefunn

週あたり投稿数
12.0
投稿間平均日数
0.0
最もアクティブな曜日
Sunday
一貫性27%

一貫性スコアは投稿の規則性を反映。高いほどオーディエンスにとって信頼できるスケジュール。

専門家判定

総合判定:

@sciencefunnがオーディエンス規模に対してより高いエンゲージメントを示しています。

比較の結果、@nasahubbleがフォロワーで特に@sciencefunnを上回っています。

フォロワー

@nasahubbleがリーチとフォロワー数で圧倒しています。

エンゲージメント率

@sciencefunnがオーディエンス規模に対してより高いエンゲージメントを示しています。

クイックサマリー

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

人気の比較

これらのアカウントがどう競い合っているか見てみよう

結果FAQ

FAQ:@nasahubble vs @sciencefunn

このヘッド・トゥ・ヘッド比較に関する具体的な質問

まだ質問がありますか?

お問い合わせ

@nasahubble vs @sciencefunn の人気比較

nasahubble vs sciencefunnnasahubble vs sciencefunn インスタnasahubble と sciencefunn 比較nasahubble と sciencefunn どっちが強い?nasahubble 対 sciencefunn Instagramnasahubble vs sciencefunn フォロワー数nasahubble vs sciencefunn エンゲージメント率nasahubble sciencefunn インスタ比較nasahubble か sciencefunn どっち?nasahubble vs sciencefunn 統計nasahubble sciencefunn どっちが人気?nasahubble vs sciencefunn 徹底比較Hubble Space Telescope vs Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoHubble Space Telescope Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko 比較Hubble Space Telescope と Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko どっちがいい?Hubble Space Telescope 対 Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko