Quarks ve Science Magazine kullanıcılarının Instagram profillerinin yan yana karşılaştırması. Takipçi sayısı, etkileşim, aktivite ve performans karşılaştırması.
Profil Genel Bakış
Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators
Account Health
@quarks.de
100
Excellent
Account Health
@sciencemagazine
95
Excellent

Quarks
@quarks.de
Wissenschaft statt Bauchgefühl | ARD Gemacht mit Hirn, Herz und unserem Rundfunkbeitrag.
1.7M
Takipçi
77%
16
Takip Edilen
4.6K
Gönderi
73%
Healthy ratio

Science Magazine
@sciencemagazine
The award-winning Instagram feed for the Science family of journals, sharing cutting-edge research, news, commentary, and visuals.
521.1K
Takipçi
23%
124
Takip Edilen
1.7K
Gönderi
27%
Healthy ratio
Ana Metrikler Karşılaştırması
Gelişmiş Metrikler
Hesap Seviyesi
1.7M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@quarks.de
521.1K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@sciencemagazine
Etkileşim Kalitesi
@quarks.de
1.16%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@sciencemagazine
0.36%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Takip Edilen/Takipçi Oranı
@quarks.de
1:107K
Very influential
@sciencemagazine
1:4.2K
Very influential
Comment-to-Like Ratio
Higher = more thoughtful engagement
Virality Potential
Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)
İçerik Yoğunluğu(posts per 1K followers)
@quarks.de
2.70
Active@sciencemagazine
3.25
ActiveJolygram Intelligence Metrics
Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns
Growth Velocity Index
Recent growth momentum
Audience Quality Score
Quality of follower base
Content Performance Index
Engagement per follower
Overall Influence Index
Combined influence potential
Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.
En İyi Gönderiler

Was sind deine größten Zukunftssorgen im Bezug auf den Klimawandel? Und wie optimistisch bist du, dass wir die Erderwärmung rechtzeitig begrenzen können? Die klimapolitischen Entscheidungen in den nächsten Jahren entscheiden darüber, welche Zukunft wir erleben werden. Wenn weiter in dem Rahmen Klimaschutz betrieben wird wie bisher, wird sich die Erde bis Ende des Jahrhunderts deutlich stärker erwärmen als um 1,5 Grad. Auch unter 2 Grad würden wir dann nicht bleiben. Das hätte deutliche Konsequenzen für unsere Zukunft. Je weiter die Erwärmung voranschreitet, desto heftiger fallen diese aus. So wird es dann immer mehr Hitzewellen geben, aber auch Versorgungskrisen und einige Gebiete auf der Erde werden dann nicht mehr bewohnbar sein. Unsere wichtigsten Quellen: IPCC (2023): Synthesis Report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report AR6, Summary for Policymakers (SPM) IPCC (2021): The Physical Science Basis, Sixth Assessment Report AR6, Summary for Policymakers (SPM)

As an asteroid hurtles toward Earth in the 1998 movie Armageddon, a geologist teams up with a veteran oil rig team on a desperate mission: Land on the space rock, drill into its surface, and detonate a nuclear bomb deep inside. They succeed, but the geologist, played by Steve Buscemi, is one of few who make it home alive. According to a new study of movie geologists, he was lucky. Out of 202 movie geologists found in 141 movies released between 1919 and 2023, 69 die on screen or are found dead—a mortality rate of about one-third, according to a paper published last month in Geology Today. The authors, several geologists–slash–movie buffs, began their analysis more than a decade ago and have provided regular updates, although this is the first in a scientific journal. To learn more, click the link in our bio. PHOTO CREDIT: UNIVERSAL PICTURES/ALAMY
quarks.de has 46.7K more likes on their top post
Hashtag Stratejisi
0
Hashtag'li
12
Hashtag'siz
2
Hashtag'li
10
Hashtag'siz
@sciencemagazine daha güçlü hashtag etkisi var
Etkileşim Trendleri
+28.4%
Etkileşim değişikliği
Beğeni
Yorum
-39.1%
Etkileşim değişikliği
Beğeni
Yorum
@quarks.de son dönemde daha iyi ivme gösteriyor
Paylaşım Ritmi
@quarks.de
@sciencemagazine
Tutarlılık puanı paylaşım düzenliliğini yansıtır. Daha yüksek = kitle için daha güvenilir program.
Uzman Kararı
Genel Karar:
@quarks.de çoğu ana metrikte önde.
Takipçi
@quarks.de erişim ve takipçi hacminde hakim.
Etkileşim Oranı
@quarks.de kitle büyüklüğüne göre daha yüksek etkileşim sunuyor.
Hızlı Özet
Data updated based on recent public posts.
Popüler Karşılaştırmalar
Bu hesapların nasıl performans gösterdiğini görün
























SSS: @quarks.de vs @sciencemagazine
Bu baş başa karşılaştırma hakkında özel sorular
Hâlâ soruların var mı?
Bize ulaş