fryrsquared
iflscience

Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of Hannah Fry vs IFLScience. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.

VS

Profile Overview

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@fryrsquared

90

Excellent

Account Health

@iflscience

95

Excellent

Instagram profile picture of @fryrsquared

Hannah Fry

@fryrsquared

Maths Professor @cambridgeuniversity, science writer and all round bad ass. 📩 [email protected]

2.1M

Followers

75%

1.7K

Following

459

Posts

4%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityMedium
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison📉 Trailing
Leader
Instagram profile picture of @iflscience

IFLScience

@iflscience

The lighter side of science 🚀 For more science news click here 👇👇👇👇

696.1K

Followers

25%

309

Following

10.7K

Posts

96%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison🔝 Leading

Key Metrics Head-to-Head

@fryrsquared
5
Winning on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 1 Ahead
@iflscience
1
Trailing on metrics
@fryrsquared
Detailed Breakdown
@iflscience
2.1M
Followers
67% ahead
696.1K
1.7K
Following
82% ahead
309
459
Total Posts
96% ahead
10.7K
5.06%
Engagement Rate
99% ahead
0.05%
106.8K
Avg Likes
100% ahead
375
1.2K
Avg Comments
100% ahead
3
🏆 fryrsquared5 - 1iflscience

Advanced Metrics

Authority Score
Winner
87
Elite
@fryrsquared
Reach22/25
Engagement24/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency11/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
65
Expert
@iflscience
Reach20/25
Engagement0/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10

Account Tier

Mega

2.1M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@fryrsquared

Large

696.1K followers

Range: 500K-1M

@iflscience

Influence Index
Winner
90
/ 100
@fryrsquared
Influence Index
60
/ 100
@iflscience

Engagement Quality

@fryrsquared

5.06%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Good

@iflscience

0.05%

Benchmark: 0.5-1%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@fryrsquared

1:1.3K

Very influential

Excellent

@iflscience

1:2.3K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@fryrsquared1.1%
@iflscience0.8%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@fryrsquared50.0
@iflscience0.5

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@fryrsquared

0.21

Moderate

@iflscience

15.34

Very Active

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

fryrsquared70
iflscience40
Difference: 30 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

fryrsquared70
iflscience40
Difference: 30 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

fryrsquared51
iflscience1
Difference: 50 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

fryrsquared79
iflscience35
Difference: 44 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Top Posts

Winner
Top post by @fryrsquared

As a further warning for the horrors of what bleach can do if left on too long ⚠️ have a look at: Alkalis and Skin by J Greenwood, JL Tan, JC Ming, and A Abell (2016) And for a great exploration into how soap was potentially first discovered 🧼 slip and slide your way to: An Experimental Exploration of the Earliest Soapmaking, by S Pointer (2024)

@fryrsquared
320.3K
2K
Top post by @iflscience

Only 1% of people will get this joke 🫠🫠

@iflscience
1.2K
6
🏆 320.3K likesVS1.2K likes

fryrsquared has 319.2K more likes on their top post

Hashtag Strategy

Stronger Hashtag Use
@fryrsquared

3

With Hashtags

9

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.7
Avg Likes78.9K
Avg Comments1.1K
Hashtags show no clear boost
#mathscommunication#hannahfry#mattparker#universityofcambridge#publicengagement
@iflscience

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags show no clear boost

@fryrsquared has stronger hashtag impact

Engagement Trends

Stronger Trend
@fryrsquared
Rising

+140.7%

Engagement shift

+141%

Likes

+87%

Comments

Older posts avg63.4K
Recent posts avg152.6K
@iflscience
Falling

-29.2%

Engagement shift

-29%

Likes

-5%

Comments

Older posts avg443
Recent posts avg313

@fryrsquared shows better recent momentum

Posting Rhythm

@fryrsquared

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Thursday
Consistency10%

@iflscience

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Sunday
Consistency59%

Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.

Expert Verdict

Overall Verdict:

@fryrsquared leads in most key metrics.

The comparison shows @fryrsquared outperforming @iflscience most notably in Followers.

Followers

@fryrsquared dominates in reach and follower volume.

Engagement Rate

@fryrsquared delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.

Quick Summary

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Popular Comparisons

See how these accounts stack up

Results FAQ

FAQ: @fryrsquared vs @iflscience

Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparisons: @fryrsquared vs @iflscience

fryrsquared vs iflsciencefryrsquared vs iflscience Instagramfryrsquared and iflscience comparedCompare fryrsquared and iflsciencefryrsquared versus iflscience on Instagramfryrsquared vs iflscience follower countfryrsquared vs iflscience engagement statsfryrsquared iflscience Instagram comparisonWho has more followers: fryrsquared or iflscience?fryrsquared vs iflscience profile statsfryrsquared or iflscience – who performs better?fryrsquared vs iflscience side by sideHannah Fry vs IFLScienceHannah Fry IFLScience Instagram comparisonCompare Hannah Fry and IFLScience