Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of Hannah Fry vs Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.
Profile Overview
Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators
Account Health
@fryrsquared
90
Excellent
Account Health
@sciencefunn
100
Excellent

Hannah Fry
@fryrsquared
Maths Professor @cambridgeuniversity, science writer and all round bad ass. 📩 [email protected]
2.1M
Followers
44%
1.7K
Following
459
Posts
31%
Healthy ratio

Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko
@sciencefunn
Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:
2.8M
Followers
56%
327
Following
1K
Posts
69%
Healthy ratio
Key Metrics Head-to-Head
Advanced Metrics
Account Tier
2.1M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@fryrsquared
2.8M followers
Range: 1M-10M
@sciencefunn
Engagement Quality
@fryrsquared
5.06%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
@sciencefunn
0.83%
Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%
Following/Followers Ratio
@fryrsquared
1:1.3K
Very influential
@sciencefunn
1:8.5K
Very influential
Comment-to-Like Ratio
Higher = more thoughtful engagement
Virality Potential
Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)
Content Density(posts per 1K followers)
@fryrsquared
0.21
Moderate@sciencefunn
0.38
ModerateJolygram Intelligence Metrics
Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns
Growth Velocity Index
Recent growth momentum
Audience Quality Score
Quality of follower base
Content Performance Index
Engagement per follower
Overall Influence Index
Combined influence potential
Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.
Top Posts

As a further warning for the horrors of what bleach can do if left on too long ⚠️ have a look at: Alkalis and Skin by J Greenwood, JL Tan, JC Ming, and A Abell (2016) And for a great exploration into how soap was potentially first discovered 🧼 slip and slide your way to: An Experimental Exploration of the Earliest Soapmaking, by S Pointer (2024)

LEGO isn’t just a toy; it’s a masterclass in high-precision engineering and materials science. Here are some of the coolest science-based facts about those iconic plastic bricks. 1. The Physics of “Clutch Power” The reason LEGO bricks snap together and stay together is due to a mechanical property called clutch power. This is achieved through interference fits. The studs on top are slightly larger than the space between the tubes underneath. When you press them together, the plastic slightly deforms and then “hugs” the stud, creating friction. The tolerance for this fit is incredibly tight: 0.002 millimeters. If the mold varies by even a hair’s breadth, the bricks won’t click properly. 2. They Are Virtually Indestructible A study published in the journal Ecological Engineering estimated that a single LEGO brick could survive in the ocean for anywhere from 100 to 1,300 years before fully breaking down. This is due to the stability of ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), a robust thermoplastic that resists chemical erosion and impact. 3. The Tower of Compression How many bricks can you stack before the bottom one gets crushed? The average 2x4 LEGO brick can withstand a force of about 4,240 Newtons (roughly 950 pounds). Mathematically, you could stack approximately 375,000 bricks on top of one another before the bottom brick structural integrity fails. That tower would be about 3.5 kilometers (2.17 miles) high—way taller than Mount Olympus! Are you looking for a cool science present? Check out the last slides (and for more in our bio). We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.
fryrsquared has 251.3K more likes on their top post
Hashtag Strategy
3
With Hashtags
9
Without Hashtags
0
With Hashtags
12
Without Hashtags
@fryrsquared has stronger hashtag impact
Engagement Trends
+140.7%
Engagement shift
Likes
Comments
-95.2%
Engagement shift
Likes
Comments
@fryrsquared shows better recent momentum
Posting Rhythm
@fryrsquared
@sciencefunn
Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.
Expert Verdict
Overall Verdict:
@fryrsquared delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.
Followers
@sciencefunn dominates in reach and follower volume.
Engagement Rate
@fryrsquared delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.
Quick Summary
Data updated based on recent public posts.
Popular Comparisons
See how these accounts stack up
























FAQ: @fryrsquared vs @sciencefunn
Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison
Still have questions?
Contact us