nasawebb
quarks.de

Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of NASA Webb Telescope vs Quarks. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.

VS

Profile Overview

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@nasawebb

100

Excellent

Account Health

@quarks.de

100

Excellent

Leader
Instagram profile picture of @nasawebb

NASA Webb Telescope

@nasawebb

The Official *NASA* James Webb Space Telescope account Launch: Dec. 25, 2021. First images: July 12, 2022.

3.5M

Followers

67%

34

Following

1.3K

Posts

22%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison🔝 Leading
Instagram profile picture of @quarks.de

Quarks

@quarks.de

Wissenschaft statt Bauchgefühl | ARD Gemacht mit Hirn, Herz und unserem Rundfunkbeitrag.

1.7M

Followers

33%

16

Following

4.6K

Posts

78%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison📉 Trailing

Key Metrics Head-to-Head

@nasawebb
4
Winning on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 1 Ahead
@quarks.de
2
Trailing on metrics
@nasawebb
Detailed Breakdown
@quarks.de
3.5M
Followers
52% ahead
1.7M
34
Following
53% ahead
16
1.3K
Total Posts
72% ahead
4.6K
2.15%
Engagement Rate
55% ahead
0.96%
75.8K
Avg Likes
79% ahead
15.9K
225
Avg Comments
54% ahead
492
🏆 nasawebb4 - 2quarks.de

Advanced Metrics

Authority Score
Winner
82
Elite
@nasawebb
Reach22/25
Engagement15/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
72
Expert
@quarks.de
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10

Account Tier

Mega

3.5M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@nasawebb

Mega

1.7M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@quarks.de

Influence Index
Winner
76
/ 100
@nasawebb
Influence Index
70
/ 100
@quarks.de

Engagement Quality

@nasawebb

2.15%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Average

@quarks.de

0.96%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@nasawebb

1:104.2K

Very influential

Excellent

@quarks.de

1:107K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@nasawebb0.3%
@quarks.de3.1%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@nasawebb21.4
@quarks.de9.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@nasawebb

0.36

Moderate

@quarks.de

2.70

Active

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

nasawebb53
quarks.de46
Difference: 7 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

nasawebb53
quarks.de46
Difference: 7 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

nasawebb21
quarks.de10
Difference: 12 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

nasawebb70
quarks.de64
Difference: 6 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Top Posts

Winner
Top post by @nasawebb

Don’t let anyone dull your shine 💫 The heart of galaxy M77 is shining so brightly in this Webb telescope image, it nearly outshines the galaxy itself. The intense glow is due to gas being pulled into a tight and rapid orbit around the central black hole. The motion of the gas heats it up, releasing tremendous amounts of radiation. The first image is Webb’s mid-infrared view with swirling filaments of dust shown in blue. The glowing orange bubbles along the arms are being carved out by newly-formed star clusters. In the second image, the near-infrared reveals a bar spanning 6,000 light-years across the central region. This bar is enclosed by a bright ring, called a starburst ring, formed by the inner ends of the galaxy’s two spiral arms. Starburst regions in galaxies are zones of high star formation rates. The third image is a composite image, combining both mid and near-infrared shots into one. Those bright orange lines radiating out of the center of all images are diffraction spikes, an optical effect caused by the telescope itself. When observing a bright object such as a star, the light gets slightly bent (or diffracted) around some of the telescope’s structures. Due to Webb’s optics, its images have a six-plus-two-pointed pattern around bright objects. Hubble images have four-pointed patterns due to its structure. Credit: ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, A. Leroy #NASA #Webb #Galaxy

@nasawebb
734.1K
1.8K
Top post by @quarks.de

Den Lehrkräften in unserer Community erzählen wir wahrscheinlich nichts Neues. Wir sind gespannt auf eure Erfahrungen. Und bei allen anderen würde uns interessieren, ob ihr dieses Klischee auch im Kopf hattet. Rund 90 % der Lehrer:innen arbeiten gerne an ihrer Schule. Sie engagieren sich, doch dieses Engagement hat seinen Preis. Lehrkräfte in Deutschland leisten durchschnittlich drei Überstunden pro Woche – zusätzlich zu einer ohnehin schon hohen Arbeitsbelastung. Die Lärmbelastung, etwa in Pausen und im Sportunterricht, stellt zusätzlich ein Gesundheitsrisiko dar. Deshalb fordert der Deutsche Lehrerverband: Schulen brauchen mehr Personal, um Lehrkräfte zu entlasten und um Ausfälle zu kompensieren. Außerdem braucht es mehr Zeit und Raum für Sozialarbeit und psychologische Betreuung der Schüler:innen. Wie viel Zeit für zusätzliche Aufgaben wie Elterngespräche oder Dokumentation erforderlich ist, ist oft unklar. Der Verband fordert weniger Bürokratie, damit Lehrer sich wieder auf das Unterrichten konzentrieren können. Unsere Quellen, u.a.: Deutsches Schulbarometer 2025 Kooperationsstelle Hochschulen und Gewerkschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft Seibt et al.: Lehrerarbeit im Wandel (2021) Mußmann et al.: Arbeitszeit und Arbeitsbelastung von Lehrkräften an Berliner Schulen 2023/2024 (2025)

@quarks.de
46.2K
999
🏆 734.1K likesVS46.2K likes

nasawebb has 687.9K more likes on their top post

Hashtag Strategy

Stronger Hashtag Use
@nasawebb

4

With Hashtags

8

Without Hashtags

Avg per post1.5
Avg Likes199K
Avg Comments498
Hashtags increase engagement
#space#nasa#beautiful#galaxy#universe
@quarks.de

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags show no clear boost

@nasawebb has stronger hashtag impact

Engagement Trends

@nasawebb
Falling

-86.0%

Engagement shift

-86%

Likes

-80%

Comments

Older posts avg133.5K
Recent posts avg18.6K
Stronger Trend
@quarks.de
Falling

-9.2%

Engagement shift

-9%

Likes

-21%

Comments

Older posts avg17.2K
Recent posts avg15.6K

@quarks.de shows better recent momentum

Posting Rhythm

@nasawebb

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Friday
Consistency39%

@quarks.de

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Wednesday
Consistency70%

Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.

Expert Verdict

Overall Verdict:

@nasawebb leads in most key metrics.

The comparison shows @nasawebb outperforming @quarks.de most notably in Followers.

Followers

@nasawebb dominates in reach and follower volume.

Engagement Rate

@nasawebb delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.

Quick Summary

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Popular Comparisons

See how these accounts stack up

Results FAQ

FAQ: @nasawebb vs @quarks.de

Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparisons: @nasawebb vs @quarks.de

nasawebb vs quarks.denasawebb vs quarks.de Instagramnasawebb and quarks.de comparedCompare nasawebb and quarks.denasawebb versus quarks.de on Instagramnasawebb vs quarks.de follower countnasawebb vs quarks.de engagement statsnasawebb quarks.de Instagram comparisonWho has more followers: nasawebb or quarks.de?nasawebb vs quarks.de profile statsnasawebb or quarks.de – who performs better?nasawebb vs quarks.de side by sideNASA Webb Telescope vs QuarksNASA Webb Telescope Quarks Instagram comparisonCompare NASA Webb Telescope and Quarks