quarks.de
sciencefunn

Side-by-side Instagram profile comparison of Quarks vs Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko. Followers, engagement, activity, and performance compared.

VS

Profile Overview

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@quarks.de

100

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencefunn

100

Excellent

Leader
Instagram profile picture of @quarks.de

Quarks

@quarks.de

Wissenschaft statt Bauchgefühl | ARD Gemacht mit Hirn, Herz und unserem Rundfunkbeitrag.

1.7M

Followers

38%

16

Following

4.6K

Posts

82%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison🔝 Leading
Instagram profile picture of @sciencefunn

Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko

@sciencefunn

Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:

2.8M

Followers

62%

327

Following

1K

Posts

18%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparison📉 Trailing

Key Metrics Head-to-Head

@quarks.de
3
Tied on metrics
Competition
VS
Even Match
@sciencefunn
3
Tied on metrics
@quarks.de
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencefunn
1.7M
Followers
38% ahead
2.8M
16
Following
95% ahead
327
4.6K
Total Posts
77% ahead
1K
0.96%
Engagement Rate
13% ahead
0.83%
15.9K
Avg Likes
30% ahead
22.9K
492
Avg Comments
65% ahead
174
quarks.de3 - 3sciencefunn

Advanced Metrics

Authority Score
Winner
72
Expert
@quarks.de
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Authority Score
62
Expert
@sciencefunn
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

Account Tier

Mega

1.7M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@quarks.de

Mega

2.8M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@sciencefunn

Influence Index
Winner
70
/ 100
@quarks.de
Influence Index
54
/ 100
@sciencefunn

Engagement Quality

@quarks.de

0.96%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

@sciencefunn

0.83%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Following/Followers Ratio

@quarks.de

1:107K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencefunn

1:8.5K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@quarks.de3.1%
@sciencefunn0.8%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@quarks.de9.3
@sciencefunn8.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Content Density(posts per 1K followers)

@quarks.de

2.70

Active

@sciencefunn

0.38

Moderate

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

quarks.de46
sciencefunn45
Difference: 1 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

quarks.de46
sciencefunn45
Difference: 1 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

quarks.de10
sciencefunn8
Difference: 1 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

quarks.de64
sciencefunn65
Difference: 1 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Top Posts

Top post by @quarks.de

Den Lehrkräften in unserer Community erzählen wir wahrscheinlich nichts Neues. Wir sind gespannt auf eure Erfahrungen. Und bei allen anderen würde uns interessieren, ob ihr dieses Klischee auch im Kopf hattet. Rund 90 % der Lehrer:innen arbeiten gerne an ihrer Schule. Sie engagieren sich, doch dieses Engagement hat seinen Preis. Lehrkräfte in Deutschland leisten durchschnittlich drei Überstunden pro Woche – zusätzlich zu einer ohnehin schon hohen Arbeitsbelastung. Die Lärmbelastung, etwa in Pausen und im Sportunterricht, stellt zusätzlich ein Gesundheitsrisiko dar. Deshalb fordert der Deutsche Lehrerverband: Schulen brauchen mehr Personal, um Lehrkräfte zu entlasten und um Ausfälle zu kompensieren. Außerdem braucht es mehr Zeit und Raum für Sozialarbeit und psychologische Betreuung der Schüler:innen. Wie viel Zeit für zusätzliche Aufgaben wie Elterngespräche oder Dokumentation erforderlich ist, ist oft unklar. Der Verband fordert weniger Bürokratie, damit Lehrer sich wieder auf das Unterrichten konzentrieren können. Unsere Quellen, u.a.: Deutsches Schulbarometer 2025 Kooperationsstelle Hochschulen und Gewerkschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft Seibt et al.: Lehrerarbeit im Wandel (2021) Mußmann et al.: Arbeitszeit und Arbeitsbelastung von Lehrkräften an Berliner Schulen 2023/2024 (2025)

@quarks.de
46.2K
999
Winner
Top post by @sciencefunn

LEGO isn’t just a toy; it’s a masterclass in high-precision engineering and materials science. Here are some of the coolest science-based facts about those iconic plastic bricks. 1. The Physics of “Clutch Power” The reason LEGO bricks snap together and stay together is due to a mechanical property called clutch power. This is achieved through interference fits. The studs on top are slightly larger than the space between the tubes underneath. When you press them together, the plastic slightly deforms and then “hugs” the stud, creating friction. The tolerance for this fit is incredibly tight: 0.002 millimeters. If the mold varies by even a hair’s breadth, the bricks won’t click properly. 2. They Are Virtually Indestructible A study published in the journal Ecological Engineering estimated that a single LEGO brick could survive in the ocean for anywhere from 100 to 1,300 years before fully breaking down. This is due to the stability of ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), a robust thermoplastic that resists chemical erosion and impact. 3. The Tower of Compression How many bricks can you stack before the bottom one gets crushed? The average 2x4 LEGO brick can withstand a force of about 4,240 Newtons (roughly 950 pounds). Mathematically, you could stack approximately 375,000 bricks on top of one another before the bottom brick structural integrity fails. That tower would be about 3.5 kilometers (2.17 miles) high—way taller than Mount Olympus! Are you looking for a cool science present? Check out the last slides (and for more in our bio). We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.

@sciencefunn
69K
212
46.2K likesVS69K likes 🏆

sciencefunn has 22.8K more likes on their top post

Hashtag Strategy

@quarks.de

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags show no clear boost
@sciencefunn

0

With Hashtags

12

Without Hashtags

Avg per post0.0
Avg Likes0
Avg Comments0
Hashtags show no clear boost

Engagement Trends

Stronger Trend
@quarks.de
Falling

-9.2%

Engagement shift

-9%

Likes

-21%

Comments

Older posts avg17.2K
Recent posts avg15.6K
@sciencefunn
Falling

-95.2%

Engagement shift

-95%

Likes

-74%

Comments

Older posts avg44K
Recent posts avg2.1K

@quarks.de shows better recent momentum

Posting Rhythm

@quarks.de

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Wednesday
Consistency70%

@sciencefunn

Posts/Week
12.0
Avg Days Between Posts
0.0
Most Active Day
Sunday
Consistency27%

Consistency score reflects regularity of posting. Higher = more reliable schedule for audience.

Expert Verdict

Overall Verdict:

@quarks.de delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.

The comparison shows @sciencefunn outperforming @quarks.de most notably in Followers.

Followers

@sciencefunn dominates in reach and follower volume.

Engagement Rate

@quarks.de delivers higher engagement relative to audience size.

Quick Summary

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Popular Comparisons

See how these accounts stack up

Results FAQ

FAQ: @quarks.de vs @sciencefunn

Specific questions about this head-to-head comparison

Still have questions?

Contact us

Popular Comparisons: @quarks.de vs @sciencefunn

quarks.de vs sciencefunnquarks.de vs sciencefunn Instagramquarks.de and sciencefunn comparedCompare quarks.de and sciencefunnquarks.de versus sciencefunn on Instagramquarks.de vs sciencefunn follower countquarks.de vs sciencefunn engagement statsquarks.de sciencefunn Instagram comparisonWho has more followers: quarks.de or sciencefunn?quarks.de vs sciencefunn profile statsquarks.de or sciencefunn – who performs better?quarks.de vs sciencefunn side by sideQuarks vs Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoQuarks Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko Instagram comparisonCompare Quarks and Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko