athleanx
sciencefunn

Comparación de perfiles de Instagram de ATHLEAN-X™ | Jeff Cavaliere MSPT, CSCS y Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko. Seguidores, interacción, actividad y rendimiento comparados.

VS

Resumen de Perfiles

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@athleanx

100

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencefunn

100

Excellent

Leader
Instagram profile picture of @athleanx

ATHLEAN-X™ | Jeff Cavaliere MSPT, CSCS

@athleanx

If you want to look like an athlete you've got to train like an athlete! Full programs, meal plans and supplements here 👇🏼

2.4M

Seguidores

46%

222

Siguiendo

2K

Publicaciones

66%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación🔝 Leading
Instagram profile picture of @sciencefunn

Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko

@sciencefunn

Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:

2.8M

Seguidores

54%

327

Siguiendo

1K

Publicaciones

34%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación📉 Trailing

Métricas Clave Cara a Cara

@athleanx
2
Trailing on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 2 Ahead
@sciencefunn
4
Winning on metrics
@athleanx
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencefunn
2.4M
Seguidores
14% ahead
2.8M
222
Siguiendo
32% ahead
327
2K
Total Publicaciones
48% ahead
1K
0.79%
Tasa de Engagement
6% ahead
0.83%
18.5K
Prom. Likes
19% ahead
22.9K
223
Prom. Comentarios
22% ahead
174
athleanx2 - 4🏆 sciencefunn

Métricas Avanzadas

Puntuación de Autoridad
Winner
72
Expert
@athleanx
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Puntuación de Autoridad
62
Expert
@sciencefunn
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

Nivel de Cuenta

Mega

2.4M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@athleanx

Mega

2.8M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@sciencefunn

Índice de Influencia
Ganador
69
/ 100
@athleanx
Índice de Influencia
54
/ 100
@sciencefunn

Calidad de Engagement

@athleanx

0.79%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

@sciencefunn

0.83%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Ratio Siguiendo/Seguidores

@athleanx

1:10.8K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencefunn

1:8.5K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@athleanx1.2%
@sciencefunn0.8%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@athleanx7.8
@sciencefunn8.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Densidad de Contenido(posts per 1K followers)

@athleanx

0.83

Moderate

@sciencefunn

0.38

Moderate

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

athleanx45
sciencefunn45

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

athleanx45
sciencefunn45

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

athleanx8
sciencefunn8
Difference: 0 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

athleanx64
sciencefunn65
Difference: 1 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Publicaciones Top

Top post by @athleanx

COMING SOON: I got a chance to meet with my good friend Dr. Andrew Huberman @hubermanlab at the legendary Gold’s Gym in Venice Beach where so many legends trained with high intensity and incredible effort. Andrew and I talked shop and went through an arm workout together where applied science, anatomy, and biomechanics…and some plain old fashioned effort! As you know, I preach smart training at all times and putting the science back in strength so what better workout partner could there be to get our swole on?! Keep an eye out for the full workout and Humberman Lab podcast! #athleanx #hubermanlab #train #workout #getafterit

@athleanx
50.7K
641
Ganador
Top post by @sciencefunn

LEGO isn’t just a toy; it’s a masterclass in high-precision engineering and materials science. Here are some of the coolest science-based facts about those iconic plastic bricks. 1. The Physics of “Clutch Power” The reason LEGO bricks snap together and stay together is due to a mechanical property called clutch power. This is achieved through interference fits. The studs on top are slightly larger than the space between the tubes underneath. When you press them together, the plastic slightly deforms and then “hugs” the stud, creating friction. The tolerance for this fit is incredibly tight: 0.002 millimeters. If the mold varies by even a hair’s breadth, the bricks won’t click properly. 2. They Are Virtually Indestructible A study published in the journal Ecological Engineering estimated that a single LEGO brick could survive in the ocean for anywhere from 100 to 1,300 years before fully breaking down. This is due to the stability of ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), a robust thermoplastic that resists chemical erosion and impact. 3. The Tower of Compression How many bricks can you stack before the bottom one gets crushed? The average 2x4 LEGO brick can withstand a force of about 4,240 Newtons (roughly 950 pounds). Mathematically, you could stack approximately 375,000 bricks on top of one another before the bottom brick structural integrity fails. That tower would be about 3.5 kilometers (2.17 miles) high—way taller than Mount Olympus! Are you looking for a cool science present? Check out the last slides (and for more in our bio). We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.

@sciencefunn
69K
212
50.7K likesVS69K likes 🏆

sciencefunn has 18.3K more likes on their top post

Estrategia de Hashtags

Uso de Hashtags Más Fuerte
@athleanx

11

Con Hashtags

1

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación4.6
Prom. Likes16.2K
Prom. Comentarios185
Los hashtags no muestran un aumento claro
#athleanx#gym#train#mobility#forearms
@sciencefunn

0

Con Hashtags

12

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación0.0
Prom. Likes0
Prom. Comentarios0
Los hashtags no muestran un aumento claro

@athleanx muestra mayor impacto de hashtags

Tendencias de Engagement

Tendencia Más Fuerte
@athleanx
En aumento

+184.6%

Cambio en engagement

+184%

Likes

+290%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas9.8K
Prom. publicaciones recientes27.8K
@sciencefunn
En descenso

-95.2%

Cambio en engagement

-95%

Likes

-74%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas44K
Prom. publicaciones recientes2.1K

@athleanx muestra mejor momentum reciente

Ritmo de Publicación

@athleanx

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Tuesday
Consistencia52%

@sciencefunn

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Sunday
Consistencia27%

La puntuación de consistencia refleja la regularidad de publicación. Más alta = horario más confiable para la audiencia.

Veredicto Experto

Veredicto General:

@sciencefunn lidera en la mayoría de las métricas clave.


Seguidores

@sciencefunn domina en alcance y volumen de seguidores.

Tasa de Engagement

@sciencefunn entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.

Resumen Rápido

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Comparaciones Populares

Mira cómo se enfrentan estas cuentas

Preguntas Frecuentes sobre Resultados

Preguntas Frecuentes: @athleanx vs @sciencefunn

Preguntas específicas sobre esta comparación cara a cara

¿Aún tienes dudas?

Contáctanos

Comparaciones populares: @athleanx vs @sciencefunn

athleanx vs sciencefunnathleanx vs sciencefunn Instagramathleanx y sciencefunn comparaciónComparar athleanx con sciencefunnathleanx versus sciencefunn en Instagramathleanx vs sciencefunn número de seguidoresathleanx vs sciencefunn tasa de engagementathleanx sciencefunn estadísticas Instagramathleanx o sciencefunn – ¿quién gana?athleanx vs sciencefunn análisisathleanx sciencefunn ¿quién es mejor?athleanx vs sciencefunn cara a caraATHLEAN-X™ | Jeff Cavaliere MSPT, CSCS vs Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoATHLEAN-X™ | Jeff Cavaliere MSPT, CSCS Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko comparaciónComparar ATHLEAN-X™ | Jeff Cavaliere MSPT, CSCS y Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoATHLEAN-X™ | Jeff Cavaliere MSPT, CSCS versus Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko