Comparación de perfiles de Instagram de IFLScience y Science Magazine. Seguidores, interacción, actividad y rendimiento comparados.
Resumen de Perfiles
Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators
Account Health
@iflscience
95
Excellent
Account Health
@sciencemagazine
95
Excellent
696.1K
Seguidores
57%
309
Siguiendo
10.7K
Publicaciones
86%
Healthy ratio
Science Magazine
@sciencemagazine
The award-winning Instagram feed for the Science family of journals, sharing cutting-edge research, news, commentary, and visuals.
521.1K
Seguidores
43%
124
Siguiendo
1.7K
Publicaciones
14%
Healthy ratio
Métricas Clave Cara a Cara
Métricas Avanzadas
Nivel de Cuenta
696.1K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@iflscience
521.1K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@sciencemagazine
Calidad de Engagement
@iflscience
0.05%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@sciencemagazine
0.36%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Ratio Siguiendo/Seguidores
@iflscience
1:2.3K
Very influential
@sciencemagazine
1:4.2K
Very influential
Comment-to-Like Ratio
Higher = more thoughtful engagement
Virality Potential
Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)
Densidad de Contenido(posts per 1K followers)
@iflscience
15.34
Very Active@sciencemagazine
3.25
ActiveJolygram Intelligence Metrics
Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns
Growth Velocity Index
Recent growth momentum
Audience Quality Score
Quality of follower base
Content Performance Index
Engagement per follower
Overall Influence Index
Combined influence potential
Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.
Publicaciones Top
As an asteroid hurtles toward Earth in the 1998 movie Armageddon, a geologist teams up with a veteran oil rig team on a desperate mission: Land on the space rock, drill into its surface, and detonate a nuclear bomb deep inside. They succeed, but the geologist, played by Steve Buscemi, is one of few who make it home alive. According to a new study of movie geologists, he was lucky. Out of 202 movie geologists found in 141 movies released between 1919 and 2023, 69 die on screen or are found dead—a mortality rate of about one-third, according to a paper published last month in Geology Today. The authors, several geologists–slash–movie buffs, began their analysis more than a decade ago and have provided regular updates, although this is the first in a scientific journal. To learn more, click the link in our bio. PHOTO CREDIT: UNIVERSAL PICTURES/ALAMY
sciencemagazine has 4.9K more likes on their top post
Estrategia de Hashtags
0
Con Hashtags
12
Sin Hashtags
2
Con Hashtags
10
Sin Hashtags
@sciencemagazine muestra mayor impacto de hashtags
Tendencias de Engagement
-29.2%
Cambio en engagement
Likes
Comentarios
-39.1%
Cambio en engagement
Likes
Comentarios
@iflscience muestra mejor momentum reciente
Ritmo de Publicación
@iflscience
@sciencemagazine
La puntuación de consistencia refleja la regularidad de publicación. Más alta = horario más confiable para la audiencia.
Veredicto Experto
Veredicto General:
@sciencemagazine entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.
Seguidores
@iflscience domina en alcance y volumen de seguidores.
Tasa de Engagement
@sciencemagazine entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.
Resumen Rápido
Data updated based on recent public posts.
Comparaciones Populares
Mira cómo se enfrentan estas cuentas
Preguntas Frecuentes: @iflscience vs @sciencemagazine
Preguntas específicas sobre esta comparación cara a cara
¿Aún tienes dudas?
Contáctanos