quarks.de
sciencefunn

Comparación de perfiles de Instagram de Quarks y Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko. Seguidores, interacción, actividad y rendimiento comparados.

VS

Resumen de Perfiles

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@quarks.de

100

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencefunn

100

Excellent

Leader
Instagram profile picture of @quarks.de

Quarks

@quarks.de

Wissenschaft statt Bauchgefühl | ARD Gemacht mit Hirn, Herz und unserem Rundfunkbeitrag.

1.7M

Seguidores

38%

16

Siguiendo

4.6K

Publicaciones

82%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación🔝 Leading
Instagram profile picture of @sciencefunn

Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko

@sciencefunn

Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:

2.8M

Seguidores

62%

327

Siguiendo

1K

Publicaciones

18%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
Comparación📉 Trailing

Métricas Clave Cara a Cara

@quarks.de
3
Tied on metrics
Competition
VS
Even Match
@sciencefunn
3
Tied on metrics
@quarks.de
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencefunn
1.7M
Seguidores
38% ahead
2.8M
16
Siguiendo
95% ahead
327
4.6K
Total Publicaciones
77% ahead
1K
0.96%
Tasa de Engagement
13% ahead
0.83%
15.9K
Prom. Likes
30% ahead
22.9K
492
Prom. Comentarios
65% ahead
174
quarks.de3 - 3sciencefunn

Métricas Avanzadas

Puntuación de Autoridad
Winner
72
Expert
@quarks.de
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
Puntuación de Autoridad
62
Expert
@sciencefunn
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

Nivel de Cuenta

Mega

1.7M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@quarks.de

Mega

2.8M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@sciencefunn

Índice de Influencia
Ganador
70
/ 100
@quarks.de
Índice de Influencia
54
/ 100
@sciencefunn

Calidad de Engagement

@quarks.de

0.96%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

@sciencefunn

0.83%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

Ratio Siguiendo/Seguidores

@quarks.de

1:107K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencefunn

1:8.5K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@quarks.de3.1%
@sciencefunn0.8%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@quarks.de9.3
@sciencefunn8.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

Densidad de Contenido(posts per 1K followers)

@quarks.de

2.70

Active

@sciencefunn

0.38

Moderate

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

quarks.de46
sciencefunn45
Difference: 1 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

quarks.de46
sciencefunn45
Difference: 1 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

quarks.de10
sciencefunn8
Difference: 1 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

quarks.de64
sciencefunn65
Difference: 1 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

Publicaciones Top

Top post by @quarks.de

Den Lehrkräften in unserer Community erzählen wir wahrscheinlich nichts Neues. Wir sind gespannt auf eure Erfahrungen. Und bei allen anderen würde uns interessieren, ob ihr dieses Klischee auch im Kopf hattet. Rund 90 % der Lehrer:innen arbeiten gerne an ihrer Schule. Sie engagieren sich, doch dieses Engagement hat seinen Preis. Lehrkräfte in Deutschland leisten durchschnittlich drei Überstunden pro Woche – zusätzlich zu einer ohnehin schon hohen Arbeitsbelastung. Die Lärmbelastung, etwa in Pausen und im Sportunterricht, stellt zusätzlich ein Gesundheitsrisiko dar. Deshalb fordert der Deutsche Lehrerverband: Schulen brauchen mehr Personal, um Lehrkräfte zu entlasten und um Ausfälle zu kompensieren. Außerdem braucht es mehr Zeit und Raum für Sozialarbeit und psychologische Betreuung der Schüler:innen. Wie viel Zeit für zusätzliche Aufgaben wie Elterngespräche oder Dokumentation erforderlich ist, ist oft unklar. Der Verband fordert weniger Bürokratie, damit Lehrer sich wieder auf das Unterrichten konzentrieren können. Unsere Quellen, u.a.: Deutsches Schulbarometer 2025 Kooperationsstelle Hochschulen und Gewerkschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft Seibt et al.: Lehrerarbeit im Wandel (2021) Mußmann et al.: Arbeitszeit und Arbeitsbelastung von Lehrkräften an Berliner Schulen 2023/2024 (2025)

@quarks.de
46.2K
999
Ganador
Top post by @sciencefunn

LEGO isn’t just a toy; it’s a masterclass in high-precision engineering and materials science. Here are some of the coolest science-based facts about those iconic plastic bricks. 1. The Physics of “Clutch Power” The reason LEGO bricks snap together and stay together is due to a mechanical property called clutch power. This is achieved through interference fits. The studs on top are slightly larger than the space between the tubes underneath. When you press them together, the plastic slightly deforms and then “hugs” the stud, creating friction. The tolerance for this fit is incredibly tight: 0.002 millimeters. If the mold varies by even a hair’s breadth, the bricks won’t click properly. 2. They Are Virtually Indestructible A study published in the journal Ecological Engineering estimated that a single LEGO brick could survive in the ocean for anywhere from 100 to 1,300 years before fully breaking down. This is due to the stability of ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), a robust thermoplastic that resists chemical erosion and impact. 3. The Tower of Compression How many bricks can you stack before the bottom one gets crushed? The average 2x4 LEGO brick can withstand a force of about 4,240 Newtons (roughly 950 pounds). Mathematically, you could stack approximately 375,000 bricks on top of one another before the bottom brick structural integrity fails. That tower would be about 3.5 kilometers (2.17 miles) high—way taller than Mount Olympus! Are you looking for a cool science present? Check out the last slides (and for more in our bio). We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.

@sciencefunn
69K
212
46.2K likesVS69K likes 🏆

sciencefunn has 22.8K more likes on their top post

Estrategia de Hashtags

@quarks.de

0

Con Hashtags

12

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación0.0
Prom. Likes0
Prom. Comentarios0
Los hashtags no muestran un aumento claro
@sciencefunn

0

Con Hashtags

12

Sin Hashtags

Prom. por publicación0.0
Prom. Likes0
Prom. Comentarios0
Los hashtags no muestran un aumento claro

Tendencias de Engagement

Tendencia Más Fuerte
@quarks.de
En descenso

-9.2%

Cambio en engagement

-9%

Likes

-21%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas17.2K
Prom. publicaciones recientes15.6K
@sciencefunn
En descenso

-95.2%

Cambio en engagement

-95%

Likes

-74%

Comentarios

Prom. publicaciones antiguas44K
Prom. publicaciones recientes2.1K

@quarks.de muestra mejor momentum reciente

Ritmo de Publicación

@quarks.de

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Wednesday
Consistencia70%

@sciencefunn

Publicaciones/Semana
12.0
Días Prom. Entre Publicaciones
0.0
Día Más Activo
Sunday
Consistencia27%

La puntuación de consistencia refleja la regularidad de publicación. Más alta = horario más confiable para la audiencia.

Veredicto Experto

Veredicto General:

@quarks.de entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.

La comparación muestra que @sciencefunn supera a @quarks.de notablemente en Seguidores.

Seguidores

@sciencefunn domina en alcance y volumen de seguidores.

Tasa de Engagement

@quarks.de entrega mayor engagement en relación al tamaño de audiencia.

Resumen Rápido

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

Comparaciones Populares

Mira cómo se enfrentan estas cuentas

Preguntas Frecuentes sobre Resultados

Preguntas Frecuentes: @quarks.de vs @sciencefunn

Preguntas específicas sobre esta comparación cara a cara

¿Aún tienes dudas?

Contáctanos

Comparaciones populares: @quarks.de vs @sciencefunn

quarks.de vs sciencefunnquarks.de vs sciencefunn Instagramquarks.de y sciencefunn comparaciónComparar quarks.de con sciencefunnquarks.de versus sciencefunn en Instagramquarks.de vs sciencefunn número de seguidoresquarks.de vs sciencefunn tasa de engagementquarks.de sciencefunn estadísticas Instagramquarks.de o sciencefunn – ¿quién gana?quarks.de vs sciencefunn análisisquarks.de sciencefunn ¿quién es mejor?quarks.de vs sciencefunn cara a caraQuarks vs Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoQuarks Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko comparaciónComparar Quarks y Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoQuarks versus Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko