nasawebb
sciencefunn

NASA Webb TelescopeとScience Is Fun By Tomas RoskoのInstagramプロフィールを並べて比較。フォロワー、エンゲージメント、アクティビティ、パフォーマンスを比較。

VS

プロフィール概要

Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators

Account Health

@nasawebb

100

Excellent

Account Health

@sciencefunn

100

Excellent

Leader
Instagram profile picture of @nasawebb

NASA Webb Telescope

@nasawebb

The Official *NASA* James Webb Space Telescope account Launch: Dec. 25, 2021. First images: July 12, 2022.

3.5M

フォロワー

56%

34

フォロー中

1.3K

投稿

55%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
比較🔝 Leading
Instagram profile picture of @sciencefunn

Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko

@sciencefunn

Welcome to a place, where science is cool & fun.🤓 Check out our cool science gadgets store:

2.8M

フォロワー

44%

327

フォロー中

1K

投稿

45%

F/F Ratio1:0.0

Healthy ratio

Content DensityHigh
Activity StatusPublic
比較📉 Trailing

主要メトリクス対決

@nasawebb
5
Winning on metrics
Competition
VS
Profile 1 Ahead
@sciencefunn
1
Trailing on metrics
@nasawebb
Detailed Breakdown
@sciencefunn
3.5M
フォロワー
22% ahead
2.8M
34
フォロー中
90% ahead
327
1.3K
総投稿数
19% ahead
1K
2.15%
エンゲージメント率
61% ahead
0.83%
75.8K
平均いいね数
70% ahead
22.9K
225
平均コメント数
23% ahead
174
🏆 nasawebb5 - 1sciencefunn

高度メトリクス

権威スコア
Winner
82
Elite
@nasawebb
Reach22/25
Engagement15/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification10/10
権威スコア
62
Expert
@sciencefunn
Reach22/25
Engagement5/30
Ratio20/20
Consistency15/15
Verification0/10

アカウントティア

Mega

3.5M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@nasawebb

Mega

2.8M followers

Range: 1M-10M

@sciencefunn

影響力インデックス
勝者
76
/ 100
@nasawebb
影響力インデックス
54
/ 100
@sciencefunn

エンゲージメント品質

@nasawebb

2.15%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Average

@sciencefunn

0.83%

Benchmark: 0.2-0.5%

Low

フォロー中/フォロワー比率

@nasawebb

1:104.2K

Very influential

Excellent

@sciencefunn

1:8.5K

Very influential

Excellent

Comment-to-Like Ratio

@nasawebb0.3%
@sciencefunn0.8%

Higher = more thoughtful engagement

Virality Potential

@nasawebb21.4
@sciencefunn8.3

Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)

コンテンツ密度(posts per 1K followers)

@nasawebb

0.36

Moderate

@sciencefunn

0.38

Moderate

Jolygram Intelligence Metrics

Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns

Growth Velocity Index

Recent growth momentum

nasawebb53
sciencefunn45
Difference: 8 points

Audience Quality Score

Quality of follower base

nasawebb53
sciencefunn45
Difference: 8 points

Content Performance Index

Engagement per follower

nasawebb21
sciencefunn8
Difference: 13 points

Overall Influence Index

Combined influence potential

nasawebb70
sciencefunn65
Difference: 5 points

Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.

トップ投稿

勝者
Top post by @nasawebb

Don’t let anyone dull your shine 💫 The heart of galaxy M77 is shining so brightly in this Webb telescope image, it nearly outshines the galaxy itself. The intense glow is due to gas being pulled into a tight and rapid orbit around the central black hole. The motion of the gas heats it up, releasing tremendous amounts of radiation. The first image is Webb’s mid-infrared view with swirling filaments of dust shown in blue. The glowing orange bubbles along the arms are being carved out by newly-formed star clusters. In the second image, the near-infrared reveals a bar spanning 6,000 light-years across the central region. This bar is enclosed by a bright ring, called a starburst ring, formed by the inner ends of the galaxy’s two spiral arms. Starburst regions in galaxies are zones of high star formation rates. The third image is a composite image, combining both mid and near-infrared shots into one. Those bright orange lines radiating out of the center of all images are diffraction spikes, an optical effect caused by the telescope itself. When observing a bright object such as a star, the light gets slightly bent (or diffracted) around some of the telescope’s structures. Due to Webb’s optics, its images have a six-plus-two-pointed pattern around bright objects. Hubble images have four-pointed patterns due to its structure. Credit: ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, A. Leroy #NASA #Webb #Galaxy

@nasawebb
734.1K
1.8K
Top post by @sciencefunn

LEGO isn’t just a toy; it’s a masterclass in high-precision engineering and materials science. Here are some of the coolest science-based facts about those iconic plastic bricks. 1. The Physics of “Clutch Power” The reason LEGO bricks snap together and stay together is due to a mechanical property called clutch power. This is achieved through interference fits. The studs on top are slightly larger than the space between the tubes underneath. When you press them together, the plastic slightly deforms and then “hugs” the stud, creating friction. The tolerance for this fit is incredibly tight: 0.002 millimeters. If the mold varies by even a hair’s breadth, the bricks won’t click properly. 2. They Are Virtually Indestructible A study published in the journal Ecological Engineering estimated that a single LEGO brick could survive in the ocean for anywhere from 100 to 1,300 years before fully breaking down. This is due to the stability of ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), a robust thermoplastic that resists chemical erosion and impact. 3. The Tower of Compression How many bricks can you stack before the bottom one gets crushed? The average 2x4 LEGO brick can withstand a force of about 4,240 Newtons (roughly 950 pounds). Mathematically, you could stack approximately 375,000 bricks on top of one another before the bottom brick structural integrity fails. That tower would be about 3.5 kilometers (2.17 miles) high—way taller than Mount Olympus! Are you looking for a cool science present? Check out the last slides (and for more in our bio). We share wholesome science content. Feel free to join us 👉 @sciencefunn for more.

@sciencefunn
69K
212
🏆 734.1K likesVS69K likes

nasawebb has 665.1K more likes on their top post

ハッシュタグ戦略

より優れたハッシュタグ戦略
@nasawebb

4

ハッシュタグあり

8

ハッシュタグなし

投稿あたり平均1.5
平均いいね数199K
平均コメント数498
ハッシュタグ使用でエンゲージメント向上
#space#nasa#beautiful#galaxy#universe
@sciencefunn

0

ハッシュタグあり

12

ハッシュタグなし

投稿あたり平均0.0
平均いいね数0
平均コメント数0
ハッシュタグに明確な効果なし

@nasawebb の方がハッシュタグ効果が強い

エンゲージメントトレンド

より強いトレンド
@nasawebb
下降中

-86.0%

エンゲージメント変化

-86%

いいね

-80%

コメント

古い投稿平均133.5K
最近の投稿平均18.6K
@sciencefunn
下降中

-95.2%

エンゲージメント変化

-95%

いいね

-74%

コメント

古い投稿平均44K
最近の投稿平均2.1K

@nasawebb の方が最近の勢いが強い

投稿リズム

@nasawebb

週あたり投稿数
12.0
投稿間平均日数
0.0
最もアクティブな曜日
Friday
一貫性39%

@sciencefunn

週あたり投稿数
12.0
投稿間平均日数
0.0
最もアクティブな曜日
Sunday
一貫性27%

一貫性スコアは投稿の規則性を反映。高いほどオーディエンスにとって信頼できるスケジュール。

専門家判定

総合判定:

@nasawebbがほとんどの主要メトリクスでリードしています。

比較の結果、@nasawebbがフォロワーで特に@sciencefunnを上回っています。

フォロワー

@nasawebbがリーチとフォロワー数で圧倒しています。

エンゲージメント率

@nasawebbがオーディエンス規模に対してより高いエンゲージメントを示しています。

クイックサマリー

Data updated based on recent public posts.

Popular Intelligence Delta

人気の比較

これらのアカウントがどう競い合っているか見てみよう

結果FAQ

FAQ:@nasawebb vs @sciencefunn

このヘッド・トゥ・ヘッド比較に関する具体的な質問

まだ質問がありますか?

お問い合わせ

@nasawebb vs @sciencefunn の人気比較

nasawebb vs sciencefunnnasawebb vs sciencefunn インスタnasawebb と sciencefunn 比較nasawebb と sciencefunn どっちが強い?nasawebb 対 sciencefunn Instagramnasawebb vs sciencefunn フォロワー数nasawebb vs sciencefunn エンゲージメント率nasawebb sciencefunn インスタ比較nasawebb か sciencefunn どっち?nasawebb vs sciencefunn 統計nasawebb sciencefunn どっちが人気?nasawebb vs sciencefunn 徹底比較NASA Webb Telescope vs Science Is Fun By Tomas RoskoNASA Webb Telescope Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko 比較NASA Webb Telescope と Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko どっちがいい?NASA Webb Telescope 対 Science Is Fun By Tomas Rosko