IFLScience ve Science Magazine kullanıcılarının Instagram profillerinin yan yana karşılaştırması. Takipçi sayısı, etkileşim, aktivite ve performans karşılaştırması.
Profil Genel Bakış
Account size, health metrics, and growth indicators
Account Health
@iflscience
95
Excellent
Account Health
@sciencemagazine
95
Excellent
696.1K
Takipçi
57%
309
Takip Edilen
10.7K
Gönderi
86%
Healthy ratio
Science Magazine
@sciencemagazine
The award-winning Instagram feed for the Science family of journals, sharing cutting-edge research, news, commentary, and visuals.
521.1K
Takipçi
43%
124
Takip Edilen
1.7K
Gönderi
14%
Healthy ratio
Ana Metrikler Karşılaştırması
Gelişmiş Metrikler
Hesap Seviyesi
696.1K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@iflscience
521.1K followers
Range: 500K-1M
@sciencemagazine
Etkileşim Kalitesi
@iflscience
0.05%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
@sciencemagazine
0.36%
Benchmark: 0.5-1%
Takip Edilen/Takipçi Oranı
@iflscience
1:2.3K
Very influential
@sciencemagazine
1:4.2K
Very influential
Comment-to-Like Ratio
Higher = more thoughtful engagement
Virality Potential
Engagement per 1K followers (0-100 scale)
İçerik Yoğunluğu(posts per 1K followers)
@iflscience
15.34
Very Active@sciencemagazine
3.25
ActiveJolygram Intelligence Metrics
Advanced analytics combining reach, engagement, content quality, and growth patterns
Growth Velocity Index
Recent growth momentum
Audience Quality Score
Quality of follower base
Content Performance Index
Engagement per follower
Overall Influence Index
Combined influence potential
Intelligence Metrics provide deeper insights into creator effectiveness, audience quality, and growth momentum beyond basic follower counts. These metrics help identify authentic influence and sustainable growth patterns.
En İyi Gönderiler
As an asteroid hurtles toward Earth in the 1998 movie Armageddon, a geologist teams up with a veteran oil rig team on a desperate mission: Land on the space rock, drill into its surface, and detonate a nuclear bomb deep inside. They succeed, but the geologist, played by Steve Buscemi, is one of few who make it home alive. According to a new study of movie geologists, he was lucky. Out of 202 movie geologists found in 141 movies released between 1919 and 2023, 69 die on screen or are found dead—a mortality rate of about one-third, according to a paper published last month in Geology Today. The authors, several geologists–slash–movie buffs, began their analysis more than a decade ago and have provided regular updates, although this is the first in a scientific journal. To learn more, click the link in our bio. PHOTO CREDIT: UNIVERSAL PICTURES/ALAMY
sciencemagazine has 4.9K more likes on their top post
Hashtag Stratejisi
0
Hashtag'li
12
Hashtag'siz
2
Hashtag'li
10
Hashtag'siz
@sciencemagazine daha güçlü hashtag etkisi var
Etkileşim Trendleri
-29.2%
Etkileşim değişikliği
Beğeni
Yorum
-39.1%
Etkileşim değişikliği
Beğeni
Yorum
@iflscience son dönemde daha iyi ivme gösteriyor
Paylaşım Ritmi
@iflscience
@sciencemagazine
Tutarlılık puanı paylaşım düzenliliğini yansıtır. Daha yüksek = kitle için daha güvenilir program.
Uzman Kararı
Genel Karar:
@sciencemagazine kitle büyüklüğüne göre daha yüksek etkileşim sunuyor.
Takipçi
@iflscience erişim ve takipçi hacminde hakim.
Etkileşim Oranı
@sciencemagazine kitle büyüklüğüne göre daha yüksek etkileşim sunuyor.
Hızlı Özet
Data updated based on recent public posts.
Popüler Karşılaştırmalar
Bu hesapların nasıl performans gösterdiğini görün
SSS: @iflscience vs @sciencemagazine
Bu baş başa karşılaştırma hakkında özel sorular
Hâlâ soruların var mı?
Bize ulaş